Mark Dangerfield

1.0k total citations
9 papers, 727 citations indexed

About

Mark Dangerfield is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Ecology and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Dangerfield has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 727 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Ecology and 3 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Dangerfield's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Mark Dangerfield is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (2 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers). Mark Dangerfield collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Mark Dangerfield's co-authors include Andrew J. Beattie, Michael R. Gillings, David A. Briscoe, Andrew Holmes, Mark Westoby, Ian Oliver, Jessica L. Green, Carlos Fragoso, L. Brussaard and Patrick Lavelle and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Global Change Biology and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Mark Dangerfield

9 papers receiving 690 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Dangerfield Australia 5 388 200 174 167 162 9 727
Lisa Bjørnlund Denmark 16 390 1.0× 421 2.1× 459 2.6× 125 0.7× 181 1.1× 17 975
Julia Seeber Austria 19 346 0.9× 299 1.5× 132 0.8× 68 0.4× 321 2.0× 52 906
S. R. Mortimer United Kingdom 13 303 0.8× 193 1.0× 331 1.9× 81 0.5× 255 1.6× 26 881
Courtney M. Patterson United States 6 216 0.6× 210 1.1× 298 1.7× 49 0.3× 112 0.7× 11 599
G.A. de Groot Netherlands 19 603 1.6× 136 0.7× 292 1.7× 410 2.5× 350 2.2× 53 1.3k
Kristin E. Haskins United States 12 236 0.6× 109 0.5× 180 1.0× 56 0.3× 136 0.8× 15 574
Felicity Crotty United Kingdom 16 314 0.8× 421 2.1× 276 1.6× 70 0.4× 148 0.9× 32 794
Xian Yang China 16 433 1.1× 270 1.4× 325 1.9× 159 1.0× 282 1.7× 39 1.1k
Jamie S. Sanderlin United States 10 564 1.5× 286 1.4× 153 0.9× 117 0.7× 62 0.4× 27 854
E. Ashley Shaw United States 14 513 1.3× 500 2.5× 342 2.0× 146 0.9× 148 0.9× 18 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Dangerfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Dangerfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Dangerfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Dangerfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Dangerfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Dangerfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Dangerfield. The network helps show where Mark Dangerfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Dangerfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Dangerfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Dangerfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Dangerfield. Mark Dangerfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Dangerfield, Mark, et al.. (2024). Meeting You Where You Are: One Mentalizing Stance, and the Many Versions Needed in (Non-)Mentalizing Systems of Help. Journal of Infant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy. 23(1). 85–95. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dangerfield, Mark, et al.. (2023). Mentalization based treatment of youth on the psychotic spectrum: clinical profiles and outcomes for youth in the ECID. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. 1206511–1206511. 3 indexed citations
3.
Jurist, Elliot, et al.. (2023). Working with parents in therapy: A mentalization-based approach.. American Psychological Association eBooks. 10 indexed citations
4.
Green, Jessica L., Andrew Holmes, Mark Westoby, et al.. (2004). Spatial scaling of microbial eukaryote diversity. Nature. 432(7018). 747–750. 464 indexed citations
5.
Pik, Anthony J., et al.. (2002). BioTrack R simplifies monitoring of invertebrates on restored sites (Australia). Ecological Restoration. 20(1). 67–68. 2 indexed citations
6.
Beattie, Andrew J. & Mark Dangerfield. (2000). RACAC Expert Workshop on Western Regional Assessment: report to the Resource and Conservation Assessment Council, NSW. 3 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Pete, Olof Andrén, L. Brussaard, et al.. (1998). Soil biota and global change at the ecosystem level: describing soil biota in mathematical models. Global Change Biology. 4(7). 773–784. 57 indexed citations
8.
Young, Iain M., Éric Blanchart, Claire Chenu, et al.. (1998). The interaction of soil biota and soil structure under global change. Global Change Biology. 4(7). 703–712. 83 indexed citations
9.
Lavelle, Patrick, Mark Dangerfield, Carlos Fragoso, et al.. (1994). The relationship between soil macrofauna and tropical soil fertility.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 137–169. 104 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026