Mark D. Prairie

536 total citations
21 papers, 438 citations indexed

About

Mark D. Prairie is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Toxicology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark D. Prairie has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 438 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Organic Chemistry and 4 papers in Toxicology. Recurrent topics in Mark D. Prairie's work include Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (10 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (8 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers). Mark D. Prairie is often cited by papers focused on Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (10 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (8 papers) and Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers). Mark D. Prairie collaborates with scholars based in United States and Norway. Mark D. Prairie's co-authors include William C. Krueger, Robert C. Kelly, J. Patrick McGovren, Tanya L. Wallace, Martha A. Warpehoski, Gary L. Petzold, Nancy A. Wicnienski, Wendell Wierenga, T F Dekoning and Ilse Gebhard and has published in prestigious journals such as FEBS Letters, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mark D. Prairie

21 papers receiving 421 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark D. Prairie United States 9 358 162 71 70 56 21 438
Alexander P. Ducruet United States 9 453 1.3× 146 0.9× 96 1.4× 99 1.4× 47 0.8× 10 545
J.A. Hartley United Kingdom 12 311 0.9× 155 1.0× 68 1.0× 76 1.1× 19 0.3× 22 424
Gregory A. Rener United States 11 285 0.8× 336 2.1× 93 1.3× 28 0.4× 53 0.9× 20 596
Kazuhiro Fukasawa Japan 11 345 1.0× 183 1.1× 203 2.9× 63 0.9× 36 0.6× 19 538
C. Caroline O’Hare United Kingdom 14 377 1.1× 185 1.1× 101 1.4× 54 0.8× 22 0.4× 24 525
Judith Markovits France 15 642 1.8× 198 1.2× 171 2.4× 139 2.0× 34 0.6× 24 764
Caleb Foster United States 12 333 0.9× 131 0.8× 64 0.9× 109 1.6× 50 0.9× 13 528
Damian O. Arnaiz United States 13 283 0.8× 345 2.1× 42 0.6× 27 0.4× 27 0.5× 18 617
Martin L. Stockley United Kingdom 8 213 0.6× 173 1.1× 113 1.6× 36 0.5× 60 1.1× 8 384
Xiao‐Hui Gu China 9 223 0.6× 311 1.9× 128 1.8× 39 0.6× 33 0.6× 13 606

Countries citing papers authored by Mark D. Prairie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark D. Prairie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark D. Prairie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark D. Prairie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark D. Prairie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark D. Prairie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark D. Prairie. The network helps show where Mark D. Prairie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark D. Prairie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark D. Prairie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark D. Prairie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark D. Prairie. Mark D. Prairie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kuo, Ming‐Shang, et al.. (1999). Isolation and identification of a major metabolite of PNU‐107859, an MMP inhibitor from the biliary fluid of rats. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 88(7). 705–708. 6 indexed citations
2.
Fairbanks, Michael B., et al.. (1995). Purification and structural characterization of the CD11b/CD18 integrin α subunit I domain reveals a folded conformation in solution. FEBS Letters. 369(2-3). 197–201. 7 indexed citations
4.
Yem, Anthony W., David M. Guido, W. Rodney Mathews, et al.. (1992). Chemical modification of Interleukin-1β: Biochemical characterization of a carbodiimide-catalyzed intramolecular cross-linked protein. Journal of Protein Chemistry. 11(6). 709–722. 5 indexed citations
5.
Krueger, William C. & Mark D. Prairie. (1992). Calf thymus DNA binding/bonding properties of CC-1065 and analogs as related to their biological activities and toxicities. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 82(1). 31–46. 7 indexed citations
6.
Dekoning, T F, Robert C. Kelly, William C. Krueger, et al.. (1992). Cytotoxicity and antitumor activity of carzelesin, a prodrug cyclopropylpyrroloindole analogue.. PubMed. 52(18). 4904–13. 81 indexed citations
7.
Krueger, William C., et al.. (1991). DNA sequence recognition by the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065 and analogs of CC-1065. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 79(3). 265–286. 6 indexed citations
8.
Krueger, William C. & Mark D. Prairie. (1991). The origin of the DNA induced circular dichroism of CC-1065 and analogs. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 79(2). 137–149. 8 indexed citations
9.
Epps, D E Van, John Cheney, Heinrich J. Schostarez, et al.. (1990). Thermodynamics of the interaction of inhibitors with the binding site of recombinant human renin. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 33(8). 2080–2086. 21 indexed citations
10.
Prairie, Mark D., et al.. (1989). Interaction of CC-1065 and its analogues with mouse DNA and chromatin.. PubMed. 49(8). 1983–8. 4 indexed citations
11.
Thériault, Nicole Y., William C. Krueger, & Mark D. Prairie. (1988). Studies on the base pair binding specificity of CC-1065 to oligomer duplexes. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 65(2). 187–201. 7 indexed citations
12.
Swenson, David H., et al.. (1988). Evaluation of DNA binding characteristics of some CC-1065 analogs. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 67(3-4). 199–213. 7 indexed citations
13.
Warpehoski, Martha A., Ilse Gebhard, Robert C. Kelly, et al.. (1988). Stereoelectronic factors influencing the biological activity and DNA interaction of synthetic antitumor agents modeled on CC-1065. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 31(3). 590–603. 117 indexed citations
14.
Martin, David G., Robert C. Kelly, William Watt, et al.. (1988). Absolute configuration of CC-1065 by x-ray crystallography on a derivatized chiral fragment (CPI) from the natural antibiotic. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 53(19). 4610–4613. 5 indexed citations
15.
Wallace, Tanya L., T F Dekoning, Martha A. Warpehoski, et al.. (1987). Structure and activity relationship of several novel CC-1065 analogs. Investigational New Drugs. 5(4). 329–337. 27 indexed citations
16.
Krueger, William C. & Mark D. Prairie. (1987). A circular dichroism study of the binding of CC-1065 to B and Z form poly(dl-5BrdC)·poly(dl-5BrdC). Chemico-Biological Interactions. 62(3). 281–295. 11 indexed citations
17.
Thériault, Nicole Y., William C. Krueger, & Mark D. Prairie. (1987). DNA Base Pair Binding Specificity of CC-1065. Nucleosides and Nucleotides. 6(1-2). 327–330. 1 indexed citations
18.
Krueger, William C., et al.. (1985). Binding of CC‐1065 to poly‐ and oligonucleotides. Biopolymers. 24(8). 1549–1572. 30 indexed citations
19.
Krueger, William C. & Mark D. Prairie. (1985). A low‐salt form of poly(dG‐5M‐dC) · poly(dG‐5M‐dC). Biopolymers. 24(5). 905–910. 18 indexed citations
20.
Li, Li H., et al.. (1984). Mechanism of action of didemnin B, a depsipeptide from the sea. Cancer Letters. 23(3). 279–288. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026