Mark Cobb

2.4k total citations
42 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Mark Cobb is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Cobb has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 15 papers in Health and 14 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mark Cobb's work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (18 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers). Mark Cobb is often cited by papers focused on Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (18 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (15 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (9 papers). Mark Cobb collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Australia. Mark Cobb's co-authors include Dawn Forman, Jane Dyson, Christina M. Puchalski, Bruce Rumbold, Merryn Gott, Christine Ingleton, Clare Gardiner, Mari Lloyd‐Williams, Daniel Wolstenholme and Simon Bowen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal of Cancer and Journal of Affective Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Mark Cobb

42 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Cobb United Kingdom 18 703 690 563 426 308 42 1.6k
Daniel H. Grossoehme United States 20 506 0.7× 427 0.6× 456 0.8× 261 0.6× 407 1.3× 119 1.6k
Jennifer Chipps South Africa 22 263 0.4× 339 0.5× 334 0.6× 457 1.1× 218 0.7× 102 1.4k
Joanne Olson Canada 18 239 0.3× 356 0.5× 308 0.5× 496 1.2× 285 0.9× 85 1.5k
Ann Harrington Australia 20 233 0.3× 335 0.5× 339 0.6× 476 1.1× 302 1.0× 58 1.3k
Richard H. Steeves United States 22 240 0.3× 346 0.5× 376 0.7× 515 1.2× 383 1.2× 50 1.6k
John D. Yoon United States 22 246 0.3× 780 1.1× 230 0.4× 628 1.5× 219 0.7× 70 1.4k
Miriam J. Stewart Canada 25 266 0.4× 221 0.3× 454 0.8× 758 1.8× 483 1.6× 44 1.6k
Timo‐Kolja Pförtner Germany 22 471 0.7× 392 0.6× 319 0.6× 855 2.0× 203 0.7× 82 1.8k
Anne Bruce Canada 21 137 0.2× 657 1.0× 460 0.8× 442 1.0× 182 0.6× 61 1.4k
Hee Sun Kang South Korea 20 162 0.2× 262 0.4× 372 0.7× 474 1.1× 405 1.3× 110 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Cobb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Cobb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Cobb. The network helps show where Mark Cobb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Cobb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Cobb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Cobb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Cobb. Mark Cobb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cobb, Mark, et al.. (2020). The Anatomical Society’s Core Anatomy Syllabus for Dental Undergraduates. Journal of Anatomy. 236(4). 737–751. 17 indexed citations
2.
McLean, Sionnadh, Andrew Booth, Melanie Gee, et al.. (2016). Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles. Patient Preference and Adherence. 10. 479–479. 87 indexed citations
3.
McLean, Sionnadh, Andrew Booth, Melanie Gee, et al.. (2016). Appointment reminder systems are effective but not optimal: Results of a systematic review and evidence synthesis employing realist principles. Manual Therapy. 25. e125–e125. 7 indexed citations
4.
Gott, Merryn, Christine Ingleton, Clare Gardiner, et al.. (2013). Transitions to palliative care for older people in acute hospitals: a mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(11). 1–138. 20 indexed citations
5.
Gott, Merryn, Clare Gardiner, Christine Ingleton, et al.. (2013). What is the extent of potentially avoidable admissions amongst hospital inpatients with palliative care needs?. BMC Palliative Care. 12(1). 9–9. 37 indexed citations
6.
Puchalski, Christina M., Mark Cobb, & Bruce Rumbold. (2012). Curriculum development in spirituality and health in the health professions. Ultramicroscopy. 148. 20–24. 2 indexed citations
7.
Lloyd‐Williams, Mari, et al.. (2012). A pilot randomised controlled trial to reduce suffering and emotional distress in patients with advanced cancer. Journal of Affective Disorders. 148(1). 141–145. 36 indexed citations
8.
Cobb, Mark, Christina M. Puchalski, & Bruce Rumbold. (2012). Oxford Textbook of Spirituality in Healthcare. Oxford University Press eBooks. 185 indexed citations
9.
Cobb, Mark, Christopher Dowrick, & Mari Lloyd‐Williams. (2012). Understanding spirituality: a synoptic view. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2(4). 339–343. 9 indexed citations
10.
Cobb, Mark. (2012). Transdisciplinary approaches to spiritual care: A chaplain's perspective. Progress in Palliative Care. 20(2). 94–97. 4 indexed citations
11.
Gardiner, Clare, Mark Cobb, Merryn Gott, & Christine Ingleton. (2011). Barriers to providing palliative care for older people in acute hospitals. Age and Ageing. 40(2). 233–238. 102 indexed citations
12.
Allmark, Peter, et al.. (2010). Is the doctrine of double effect irrelevant in end-of-life decision making?. Nursing Philosophy. 11(3). 170–177. 5 indexed citations
13.
Wolstenholme, Daniel, Mark Cobb, Peter Wright, et al.. (2010). Participatory design and the 'health and social care institution'. IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen). 275–276. 1 indexed citations
14.
Gott, Merryn, Christine Ingleton, Clare Gardiner, et al.. (2009). How to improve end of life care in acute hospitals. Nursing Older People. 21(7). 26–29. 13 indexed citations
15.
Lloyd‐Williams, Mari, Mark Cobb, Chris Shiels, & Fiona Taylor. (2006). How Well Trained Are Clergy in Care of the Dying Patient and Bereavement Support?. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 32(1). 44–51. 16 indexed citations
16.
Keeley, Vaughan, et al.. (2004). A new quality assurance package for hospital palliative care teams: the Trent Hospice Audit Group model. British Journal of Cancer. 91(2). 248–253. 9 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Mike, et al.. (2004). A prospective study of the roles, responsibilities and stresses of chaplains working within a hospice. Palliative Medicine. 18(7). 638–645. 28 indexed citations
18.
Cobb, Mark. (2001). The Dying Soul: Spiritual Care at the End of Life. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 49 indexed citations
19.
Cobb, Mark, et al.. (1998). The spiritual challenge of health care. Churchill Livingstone eBooks. 75 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Kathleen J., et al.. (1998). Cutaneous epithelioid schwannomas: a rare variant of a benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Journal of Cutaneous Pathology. 25(1). 50–55. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026