Mark Chidel

877 citations
27 papers · 672 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Chidel

26 papers receiving 599 citations

Peers

Mark Chidel
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Developmental Biology 154
  • Ecological Modeling 217
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 460
  • Ecology 463
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 133
Replace Joseph E. Duchamp with:
Joseph E. Duchamp United States
Jennifer M. Menzel United States
Brian R. Chapman United States
Scott D. Grindal Canada
Dai Fukui Japan
Sergio Estrada‐Villegas United States
Fábio Z. Farneda Brazil
Karen A. Haysom United Kingdom
J. Tiago Marques Portugal
Romeo A. Saldaña‐Vázquez Mexico
Mark Chidel relative to Joseph E. Duchamp United States Joseph E. Duchamp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Joseph E. Duchamp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chidel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Chidel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chidel. The network helps show where Mark Chidel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Mark Chidel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Chidel Line = papers co-authored together Mark Chidel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002109
2 1999104
3 200066
4 199854
5 200644
6 201425
7 201525
8 200725
9 201824
10 201123
11 200821
12 201320
13 201719
14 201818
15 200116
16 201615
17 200415
18 201910
19 20138
20 20178

About Mark Chidel

Mark Chidel is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 27 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (11 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers), Marine animal studies overview (6 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (4 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (3 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (154 citations), Ecological Modeling (217 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (460 citations), Ecology (463 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (133 citations). Mark Chidel has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Bradley Law, Graham Turner, Traecey Brassil, Leroy Gonsalves, Trent D. Penman, Peter R. Law, Amrit Kathuria, Caragh G. Threlfall and Francis Lemckert. Their work appears in journals such as Austral Ecology, Wildlife Research, Forest Ecology and Management, Pacific Conservation Biology and Biological Conservation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact