Countries citing papers authored by Mark Chiappone
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Chiappone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Chiappone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Chiappone more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Chiappone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Chiappone. The network helps show where Mark Chiappone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Chiappone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Chiappone.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Chiappone based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Chiappone. Mark Chiappone is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miller, Steven L., et al.. (2013). Distribution, abundance, and condition of Acropora corals, other benthic coral reef organisms, and marine debris in Biscayne National Park and the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary : 2012 quick look and data summary report.3 indexed citations
Miller, Steven L., et al.. (2010). Abundance, distribution and condition of benthic coral reef organisms in the upper Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 2010 quick look report and data summary.2 indexed citations
5.
Miller, Steven L., Mark Chiappone, Leanne M. Rutten, & Brian D. Keller. (2009). Large-scale assessment of the abundance, distribution and condition of benthic coral reef organisms in the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary 2009 quick look report and data summary.2 indexed citations
Ault, Jerald S., Steven G. Smith, Jiangang Luo, et al.. (2002). Baseline multispecies coral reef fish stock assessment for the Dry Tortugas.17 indexed citations
Chiappone, Mark, et al.. (2001). A rapid assessment of coral reef community structure and diversity patterns at Naval Station Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. Bulletin of Marine Science. 69(2). 373–394.13 indexed citations
Sluka, Robert D., Mark Chiappone, & Kathleen M. Sullivan. (2000). 10.1016/0967-0653(95)95042-7. Bulletin of Marine Science. 54(3). 871–880.28 indexed citations
14.
Chiappone, Mark, Kathleen M. Sullivan, & Christian Lott. (2000). 10.1016/s0967-0653(97)84904-6. Caribbean Journal of Science. 32(1). 1–13.17 indexed citations
15.
Sluka, Robert D., et al.. (1998). Density, species, and size distribution of groupers (Serranidae) in three habitats at Elbow Reef, Florida Keys. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 62(1). 219–228.23 indexed citations
16.
Lang, J. C., Pedro M. Alcolado, Juan P. Carricart‐Ganivet, et al.. (1998). Status of Coral Reefs in the Northern Areas of the Wider Caribbean. Smith ScholarWorks (Smith College). 123.15 indexed citations
17.
Chiappone, Mark & Kathleen M. Sullivan. (1996). Distribution, abundance and species composition of juvenile scleractinian corals in the Florida reef tract. 58(2). 555–569.58 indexed citations
Sullivan, Kathleen M. & Mark Chiappone. (1992). A comparison of belt quadrat and species presence/absence sampling of stony coral (Scleractinia and Milleporina) and sponges for evaluating species patterning on patch reefs of the central Bahamas. Bulletin of Marine Science. 50(3). 464–488.14 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.