Mark C. Pierce
- Biophysics top 0.05%
- Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques 15
- Ophthalmology top 0.2%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 15
- Biomedical Engineering top 0.2%
- Optical Coherence Tomography Applications 45
- Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging 32
- Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics 12
-
- Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques 11
- Retinal and Macular Surgery 8
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics top 5%
-
- Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies 14
- Co-authors
- Johannes F. de BoerBarry CenseBrett E. BoumaGuillermo J. TearneyB. Hyle ParkRebecca Richards‐KortumTeresa C. ChenSeok Hyun Yun
- Journals
- Journal of Biomedical Optics (12 papers)Optics Express (11 papers)Optics Letters (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSingaporeUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark C. Pierce
112 papers receiving 5.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 161
- Biophysics 1.5k
- Ophthalmology 1.6k
- Biomedical Engineering 4.4k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.9k
- Acoustics and Ultrasonics 61
Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Pierce
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Pierce more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Pierce
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Pierce. The network helps show where Mark C. Pierce may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 52 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 79 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 69 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 146 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 37 | |
| 16 | Ultra-high speed and ultra-high resolution optical coherence tomography and optical Doppler tomography | 2005 | 0 |
| 17 | 2005 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2004 | 139 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 87 | |
| 20 | Improved signal-to-noise ratio in spectral-domain compared with time-domain optical coherence tomographybreakdown → | 2003 | 931 |
About Mark C. Pierce
Mark C. Pierce is a scholar working on Biophysics, Acoustics and Ultrasonics and Ophthalmology, having authored 119 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (45 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (32 papers), Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques (15 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (15 papers), Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies (14 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (12 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (11 papers) and Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (1.5k citations), Ophthalmology (1.6k citations) and Biomedical Engineering (4.4k citations). Mark C. Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Johannes F. de Boer, Barry Cense, Brett E. Bouma, Guillermo J. Tearney, B. Hyle Park, Rebecca Richards‐Kortum, Teresa C. Chen, Seok Hyun Yun, Nader A. Nassif and John Strasswimmer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Optics, Optics Express, Optics Letters, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.