Mark C. Hove

442 total citations
26 papers, 336 citations indexed

About

Mark C. Hove is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark C. Hove has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 336 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Ecology, 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 6 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Mark C. Hove's work include Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers) and Mollusks and Parasites Studies (6 papers). Mark C. Hove is often cited by papers focused on Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (20 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (17 papers) and Mollusks and Parasites Studies (6 papers). Mark C. Hove collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark C. Hove's co-authors include Daniel J. Hornbach, Valerie J. Kurth, Bernard E. Sietman, Sarah L. Boyer, K. R. MacGregor, Daniel C. Allen, Anne R. Kapuscinski, Michelle R. Bartsch, Diane L. Waller and W. Gregory Cope and has published in prestigious journals such as Freshwater Biology, Hydrobiologia and Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems.

In The Last Decade

Mark C. Hove

22 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark C. Hove United States 12 319 212 74 53 49 26 336
Bernard E. Sietman United States 13 267 0.8× 144 0.7× 65 0.9× 41 0.8× 27 0.6× 25 307
Marco Denic Germany 9 309 1.0× 213 1.0× 44 0.6× 48 0.9× 77 1.6× 13 340
Todd J. Morris Canada 13 422 1.3× 298 1.4× 41 0.6× 24 0.5× 78 1.6× 42 463
Vanessa Modesto Portugal 8 279 0.9× 156 0.7× 45 0.6× 59 1.1× 19 0.4× 15 298
Erika Bódis Hungary 10 274 0.9× 141 0.7× 55 0.7× 70 1.3× 24 0.5× 12 297
Peter Cosgrove United Kingdom 8 330 1.0× 239 1.1× 51 0.7× 43 0.8× 94 1.9× 22 355
Mark W. Fritts United States 9 286 0.9× 264 1.2× 20 0.3× 37 0.7× 33 0.7× 24 355
Argentino A. Bonetto Argentina 9 154 0.5× 135 0.6× 52 0.7× 29 0.5× 26 0.5× 20 262
Adriana Novais Portugal 7 318 1.0× 136 0.6× 62 0.8× 101 1.9× 17 0.3× 7 332
Garrett W. Hopper United States 11 233 0.7× 204 1.0× 17 0.2× 10 0.2× 65 1.3× 32 274

Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Hove

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Hove's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Hove with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Hove more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Hove

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Hove. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Hove. The network helps show where Mark C. Hove may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark C. Hove

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark C. Hove. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark C. Hove based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark C. Hove. Mark C. Hove is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hornbach, Daniel J., J. L. Kozarek, Mark C. Hove, et al.. (2023). Distribution pattern of the Zebra Mussel ( Dreissena polymorpha ) in White Bear Lake, Minnesota: a spatial scale analysis. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 38(1).
2.
Hornbach, Daniel J., et al.. (2019). Influence of surrounding land-use on mussel growth and glycogen levels in the St. Croix and Minnesota River Basins. Hydrobiologia. 848(12-13). 3045–3063. 12 indexed citations
3.
Hornbach, Daniel J., et al.. (2019). A comparison of freshwater mussel assemblages along a land‐use gradient in Minnesota. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 29(11). 1826–1838. 15 indexed citations
4.
Sietman, Bernard E., et al.. (2018). Host attraction, brooding phenology, and host specialization on freshwater drum by 4 freshwater mussel species. Freshwater Science. 37(1). 96–107. 14 indexed citations
5.
Hornbach, Daniel J., Daniel C. Allen, Mark C. Hove, & K. R. MacGregor. (2017). Long‐term decline of native freshwater mussel assemblages in a federally protected river. Freshwater Biology. 63(3). 243–263. 25 indexed citations
6.
Hornbach, Daniel J., et al.. (2016). Ecosystem structure and function in two branches of an eastern Minnesota, USA, trout stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 31(4). 487–507. 5 indexed citations
7.
Sansom, Brandon J., et al.. (2013). Effects of flow restoration on mussel growth in a Wild and Scenic North American River. PubMed. 9(1). 6–6. 12 indexed citations
8.
Sietman, Bernard E., et al.. (2013). Host Fishes and Conservation Status ofAlasmidonta marginata(Bivalvia: Unionidae) in Minnesota. Northeastern Naturalist. 20(1). 49–68. 4 indexed citations
9.
Hornbach, Daniel J., et al.. (2013). The influence of two differently sized dams on mussel assemblages and growth. Hydrobiologia. 724(1). 279–291. 8 indexed citations
10.
Boyer, Sarah L., et al.. (2012). Additional minnows and topminnow identified as suitable sheepnose (Plethobasus cyphyus) hosts. 14(3). 1 indexed citations
11.
Sietman, Bernard E., et al.. (2012). Mantle Display and Glochidia Release Behaviors of Five Quadruline Freshwater Mussel Species (Bivalvia: Unionidae). American Malacological Bulletin. 30(1). 39–46. 17 indexed citations
13.
Szumowski, Suzannah C., Sarah L. Boyer, Daniel J. Hornbach, & Mark C. Hove. (2012). Genetic Diversity of Two Common Freshwater Mussel Species,Lampsilis cardiumandQuadrula pustulosa(Bivalvia: Unionidae), in a Large Federally Protected Waterway (St. Croix River, Minnesota/Wisconsin, U.S.A.). American Malacological Bulletin. 30(1). 59–72. 6 indexed citations
14.
Hove, Mark C., Bernard E. Sietman, David Heath, et al.. (2011). Early Life History and Distribution of Pistolgrip (Tritogonia verrucosa (Rafinesque, 1820)) in Minnesota and Wisconsin. American Midland Naturalist 165:338-354. The American Midland Naturalist. 165. 2 indexed citations
15.
MacGregor, K. R., Mark C. Hove, & Daniel J. Hornbach. (2009). Mussel Density at Interstate Park, St. Croix River, MN and WI: A New Equilibrium?.
16.
MacGregor, K. R., et al.. (2009). Using GIS to Assess Dam Impact on River Bathymetry.
17.
Hornbach, Daniel J., et al.. (2009). Estimating population size and habitat associations of two federally endangered mussels in the St. Croix River, Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 20(3). 250–260. 9 indexed citations
18.
MacGregor, K. R., et al.. (2008). Sediment Transport in the St. Croix River, MN/WI Above and Below the St. Croix Falls Dam. AGUFM. 2008.
19.
Allen, Daniel C., et al.. (2007). Early Life-history and Conservation Status of Venustaconcha Ellipsiformis (Bivalvia, Unionidae) in Minnesota. The American Midland Naturalist. 157(1). 74–91. 18 indexed citations
20.
Cope, W. Gregory, Mark C. Hove, Diane L. Waller, et al.. (2003). EVALUATION OF RELOCATION OF UNIONID MUSSELS TO IN SITUREFUGIA. Journal of Molluscan Studies. 69(1). 27–34. 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026