Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Use of platelet-rich fibrin in regenerative dentistry: a systematic review
2017362 citationsRichard J. Miron, Giovanni Zucchelli et al.Clinical Oral Investigationsprofile →
Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Soft Tissue Wound Healing: A Systematic Review
2016328 citationsRichard J. Miron, Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi et al.Tissue Engineering Part B Reviewsprofile →
Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2021114 citationsRichard J. Miron, Vittório Moraschini et al.Clinical Oral Investigationsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Bishara's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Bishara with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Bishara more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Bishara. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Bishara. The network helps show where Mark Bishara may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Bishara
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Bishara.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Bishara based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Bishara. Mark Bishara is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Miron, Richard J., Vittório Moraschini, Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi, et al.. (2021). Use of platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Oral Investigations. 25(5). 2461–2478.114 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Bishara, Mark, et al.. (2020). Implant Restorations: Establishing a Proper Emergence Profile.. PubMed. 41(8). e16–e20.2 indexed citations
7.
Bishara, Mark, et al.. (2018). Soft-Tissue Grafting Techniques Associated With Immediate Implant Placement.. PubMed. 39(2). e1–e4.1 indexed citations
8.
Bishara, Mark & Gregori M Kurtzman. (2017). Cutting-Edge Implant Rehabilitation Design and Management: A Tapered Abutment Approach.. PubMed. 38(7). e13–e16.4 indexed citations
9.
Miron, Richard J., Giovanni Zucchelli, Michael A. Pikos, et al.. (2017). Use of platelet-rich fibrin in regenerative dentistry: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Investigations. 21(6). 1913–1927.362 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Miron, Richard J., Mark Bishara, & Joseph Choukroun. (2017). Basics of Platelet-Rich Fibrin Therapy.. PubMed. 36(4). 74–6.19 indexed citations
11.
Miron, Richard J., Masako Fujioka‐Kobayashi, Mark Bishara, et al.. (2016). Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Soft Tissue Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Tissue Engineering Part B Reviews. 23(1). 83–99.328 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.