Mark A. Schwindt

633 total citations
8 papers, 485 citations indexed

About

Mark A. Schwindt is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Inorganic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Schwindt has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 485 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Organic Chemistry, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Inorganic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Schwindt's work include Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers). Mark A. Schwindt is often cited by papers focused on Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis (2 papers). Mark A. Schwindt collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Singapore and United States. Mark A. Schwindt's co-authors include Louis S. Hegedus, Tore Lejon, James R. Miller, Gregory L. Karrick, Thomas A. Mulhern, Éric Granger, Marvin S. Hoekstra, René Imwinkelried, Stéphane De Lombaert and Michelangelo Scalone and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Organometallics.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Schwindt

8 papers receiving 464 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark A. Schwindt Switzerland 6 377 175 107 42 26 8 485
Shin Imaizumi Japan 11 228 0.6× 104 0.6× 54 0.5× 41 1.0× 15 0.6× 40 341
Joseph F. Payack United States 11 364 1.0× 145 0.8× 93 0.9× 11 0.3× 21 0.8× 15 439
Nicholas A. Cortese United States 11 458 1.2× 126 0.7× 116 1.1× 39 0.9× 10 0.4× 12 532
Joanna Paradowska Poland 9 650 1.7× 250 1.4× 196 1.8× 40 1.0× 14 0.5× 9 729
Chitaru Hirosawa United States 15 566 1.5× 133 0.8× 108 1.0× 24 0.6× 8 0.3× 21 607
Gareth J. J. Owen‐Smith United Kingdom 4 238 0.6× 163 0.9× 48 0.4× 21 0.5× 18 0.7× 6 332
Yasuhisa Senda Japan 10 253 0.7× 90 0.5× 78 0.7× 44 1.0× 20 0.8× 56 374
Thomas Cruchter Germany 8 321 0.9× 157 0.9× 65 0.6× 25 0.6× 31 1.2× 10 367
Stefan Klaus Germany 17 860 2.3× 162 0.9× 269 2.5× 47 1.1× 14 0.5× 32 973
Jaesung Choi South Korea 14 357 0.9× 149 0.9× 166 1.6× 50 1.2× 6 0.2× 23 459

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Schwindt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Schwindt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Schwindt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Schwindt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Schwindt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Schwindt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Schwindt. The network helps show where Mark A. Schwindt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Schwindt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Schwindt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Schwindt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Schwindt. Mark A. Schwindt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Schwindt, Mark A., Michael P. Fleming, L. Mark Hodges, et al.. (2007). Enantioselective Synthesis of a Key Intermediate in a New Process for Orlistat Using Asymmetric Hydrogenation and a Grignard Reagent Promoted Lactone Cyclization. Organic Process Research & Development. 11(3). 524–533. 18 indexed citations
2.
Birk, Rolf, Martin Karpf, Kurt Püntener, et al.. (2006). With Asymmetric Hydrogenation Towards a New, Enantioselective Synthesis of Orlistat. CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry. 60(9). 561–561. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hoekstra, Marvin S., et al.. (1997). Chemical Development of CI-1008, an Enantiomerically Pure Anticonvulsant. Organic Process Research & Development. 1(1). 26–38. 129 indexed citations
4.
Hoekstra, Marvin S., et al.. (1997). ChemInform Abstract: Chemical Development of CI‐1008, an Enantiomerically Pure Anticonvulsant.. ChemInform. 28(46). 2 indexed citations
5.
Schwindt, Mark A., et al.. (1996). Unique and Efficient Synthesis of [2S-(2R*,3S*,4R*)]-2-Amino-1-cyclohexyl- 6-methyl-3,4-heptanediol, a Popular C-Terminal Component of Many Renin Inhibitors. The Journal of Organic Chemistry. 61(26). 9564–9568. 32 indexed citations
6.
Schwindt, Mark A., James R. Miller, & Louis S. Hegedus. (1991). Chromium aminocarbene complexes in organic synthesis. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 413(1-3). 143–153. 80 indexed citations
7.
Hegedus, Louis S., Mark A. Schwindt, Stéphane De Lombaert, & René Imwinkelried. (1990). Photolytic reactions of chromium aminocarbene complexes. Conversion of amides to .alpha.-amino acids. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 112(6). 2264–2273. 45 indexed citations
8.
Schwindt, Mark A., Tore Lejon, & Louis S. Hegedus. (1990). Improved synthesis of (aminocarbene)chromium(0) complexes with use of C8K-generated Cr(CO)52-. Multivariant optimization of an organometallic reaction. Organometallics. 9(10). 2814–2819. 174 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026