Mark A. Nathan

2.1k total citations
52 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Mark A. Nathan is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark A. Nathan has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 12 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Mark A. Nathan's work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (12 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers). Mark A. Nathan is often cited by papers focused on Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (12 papers) and Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (11 papers). Mark A. Nathan collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Norway. Mark A. Nathan's co-authors include Val J. Lowe, Brian P. Mullan, Kazuhiro Kitajima, Robert C. Murphy, Jared A. Christensen, Joel G. Fletcher, Akira Kawashima, Naoki Takahashi, Adam T. Froemming and William S. Harmsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Radiology and British Journal of Cancer.

In The Last Decade

Mark A. Nathan

49 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark A. Nathan United States 22 659 513 507 276 226 52 1.5k
Elba Etchebehere Brazil 23 597 0.9× 734 1.4× 352 0.7× 373 1.4× 253 1.1× 114 1.7k
János Mester Germany 21 653 1.0× 995 1.9× 384 0.8× 188 0.7× 156 0.7× 54 1.8k
C.L. Maini Italy 21 528 0.8× 695 1.4× 370 0.7× 547 2.0× 197 0.9× 70 1.7k
Rosa Sciuto Italy 24 655 1.0× 842 1.6× 481 0.9× 680 2.5× 308 1.4× 97 2.1k
Angela Spanu Italy 21 339 0.5× 676 1.3× 207 0.4× 298 1.1× 182 0.8× 104 1.3k
Robert Laing United Kingdom 26 1.3k 2.0× 335 0.7× 282 0.6× 367 1.3× 144 0.6× 81 2.1k
Ho‐Chun Song South Korea 22 300 0.5× 546 1.1× 171 0.3× 191 0.7× 179 0.8× 97 1.3k
Joon‐Kee Yoon South Korea 20 278 0.4× 520 1.0× 244 0.5× 194 0.7× 116 0.5× 109 1.4k
Ie Ryung Yoo South Korea 21 495 0.8× 514 1.0× 317 0.6× 317 1.1× 70 0.3× 90 1.3k
Naoki Otsuki Japan 23 330 0.5× 201 0.4× 689 1.4× 449 1.6× 225 1.0× 126 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Nathan. The network helps show where Mark A. Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Nathan

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Nathan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Nathan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Nathan. Mark A. Nathan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cheng, Andy, Katherine J. Baines, Mark A. Nathan, et al.. (2024). Real world experience of trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in the UK.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 42(16_suppl). 1024–1024. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hoskin, Tanya L., et al.. (2021). Repeat Sentinel Lymph Node Surgery in Recurrent Breast Cancer: Peritumoral vs. Periareolar Injections. Clinical Breast Cancer. 21(5). 466–476. 1 indexed citations
3.
Clark, Michael, Mark A. Nathan, & Stephen M. Broski. (2019). Multifocal Small Bowel Carcinoid. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 44(4). e308–e310. 4 indexed citations
4.
Stone, Jonathan J., Danyal Z. Khan, Annie T. Packard, et al.. (2018). Multimodal Imaging Aids in the Diagnosis of Perineural Spread of Prostate Cancer. World Neurosurgery. 122. e235–e240. 6 indexed citations
5.
Jasim, Sina, Mark A. Nathan, & Keith C. Bible. (2017). “Pseudo-progression” in advanced thyroid cancer in response to kinase inhibitor therapy. Endocrine. 57(1). 187–188. 1 indexed citations
6.
Arnett, Andrea, Kenneth W. Merrell, Sarah E. James, et al.. (2016). Utility of 18 F-FDG PET for Predicting Histopathologic Response in Esophageal Carcinoma following Chemoradiation. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 12(1). 121–128. 21 indexed citations
7.
Parker, William P., Jaden D. Evans, Bradley J. Stish, et al.. (2016). Patterns of Recurrence After Postprostatectomy Fossa Radiation Therapy Identified by C-11 Choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. 97(3). 526–535. 29 indexed citations
9.
Broski, Stephen M., et al.. (2015). BRAF Inhibitor-Induced Panniculitis. Clinical Nuclear Medicine. 41(3). e149–e151. 3 indexed citations
10.
Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Robert C. Murphy, Mark A. Nathan, et al.. (2014). Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparison of 11C-Choline PET/CT with Pelvic Multiparametric MR Imaging with Endorectal Coil. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 55(2). 223–232. 175 indexed citations
11.
Froemming, Adam T., Akira Kawashima, Naoki Takahashi, et al.. (2013). Individualized kV Selection and Tube Current Reduction in Excretory Phase Computed Tomography Urography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 37(4). 551–559. 20 indexed citations
13.
Kitajima, Kazuhiro, Robert C. Murphy, & Mark A. Nathan. (2013). Choline PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer: an update. Annals of Nuclear Medicine. 27(7). 581–591. 48 indexed citations
14.
Bogsrud, Trond Velde, Ian Hay, Dimitrios Karantanis, et al.. (2011). Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma and circulating antithyroglobulin autoantibodies. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 32(4). 245–251. 15 indexed citations
15.
Bogsrud, Trond Velde, Dimitrios Karantanis, Mark A. Nathan, et al.. (2008). 18 F-FDG PET in the Management of Patients with Anaplastic Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid. 18(7). 713–719. 54 indexed citations
16.
17.
Lowe, Val J., Fargol Booya, Joel G. Fletcher, et al.. (2005). Comparison of Positron Emission Tomography, Computed Tomography, and Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Initial Staging of Patients with Esophageal Cancer. Molecular Imaging and Biology. 7(6). 422–430. 111 indexed citations
18.
Foley, Thomas A., Frank Earnest, Mark A. Nathan, et al.. (2005). Differentiation of Nonperforated from Perforated Appendicitis: Accuracy of CT Diagnosis and Relationship of CT Findings to Length of Hospital Stay. Radiology. 235(1). 89–96. 66 indexed citations
19.
Cook, Edwin H., John Metz, Bennett Leventhal, et al.. (1994). Fluoxetine effects on cerebral glucose metabolism. Neuroreport. 5(14). 1745–1748. 25 indexed citations
20.
Nathan, Mark A., et al.. (1991). Security reforms: the pen and the sword. 8(4). 7–10. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026