Mark A. Johnson

96 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Hit Papers

The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene...20052026201220192005100200300400500

Peers

Mark A. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 162
  • Molecular Biology 3.4k
  • Plant Science 1.6k
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 588
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 456
  • Clinical Biochemistry 418
Replace Sha Tang with:
Sha Tang China
Toshio Kojima Japan
Zhenglong Gu United States
Ryan Lister Australia
Thomas H. Roderick United States
Deanna M. Church United States
Jennifer M. Taylor Australia
Kuniya Abe Japan
Hao Hu China
Anish Kejariwal United States
Mark A. Johnson relative to Sha Tang China Sha Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sha Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark A. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark A. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark A. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark A. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark A. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark A. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark A. Johnson. The network helps show where Mark A. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark A. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark A. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark A. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark A. Johnson. Mark A. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 2
4 4
5 15
6 1
7
New Evidence on Whether Gold Mining Stocks Are More Like Gold or Like Stocks
5
8 7
9 35
10 93
11
Changes in Gasoline Prices and Consumer Sentiment
4
12 99
13 142
14 3
15
The implications of using an inappropriate reference gene for real-time reverse transcription PCR data normalizationbreakdown →
548
16 60
17 9
18 6
19 127
20
Effect of lignin versus cellulose on the absorption of taurocholate and lipid metabolism in rats fed cholesterol diet.
1

About Mark A. Johnson

Mark A. Johnson is a scholar working on Clinical Biochemistry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 97 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Reproductive Biology (29 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (26 papers) and Plant and animal studies (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (418 citations), Molecular Biology (3.4k citations) and Plant Science (1.6k citations). Mark A. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Daphne Preuss, Ravishankar Palanivelu, Douglass M. Turnbull, Alexander R. Leydon, Stephen A. Bustin, Alimuddin Zumla, G.A.W. Rook, Jim F. Huggett, Jeffrey F. Harper and Keertan Dheda. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026