Marion Nadel

1.8k total citations
24 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Marion Nadel is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Marion Nadel has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Oncology, 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Marion Nadel's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers). Marion Nadel is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (10 papers) and Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (6 papers). Marion Nadel collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Marion Nadel's co-authors include Wendy Atkin, Kirsten McCaffery, Jane Wardle, H. Irene Hall, Sally W. Vernon, Ann Meadow, Elizabeth C. Jones, Carrie N. Klabunde, Paul Frame and Daniel May and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Gastroenterology and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Marion Nadel

24 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marion Nadel United States 16 1.0k 544 251 183 151 24 1.4k
Robert J. Uhler United States 21 1.2k 1.2× 313 0.6× 100 0.4× 99 0.5× 493 3.3× 26 1.7k
Adam B. Murphy United States 19 275 0.3× 547 1.0× 212 0.8× 163 0.9× 185 1.2× 58 1.2k
Gregory Harper United States 20 319 0.3× 123 0.2× 150 0.6× 263 1.4× 164 1.1× 34 1.3k
Edmundo Carvalho Mauad Brazil 18 447 0.4× 161 0.3× 74 0.3× 149 0.8× 311 2.1× 56 958
Karen M. Linklater United Kingdom 23 680 0.7× 448 0.8× 97 0.4× 339 1.9× 160 1.1× 38 1.4k
Mary Ann Greene United States 17 379 0.4× 117 0.2× 57 0.2× 77 0.4× 241 1.6× 30 809
Catherine Lejeune France 18 808 0.8× 528 1.0× 360 1.4× 166 0.9× 128 0.8× 65 1.2k
Louise F. Wilson Australia 22 422 0.4× 87 0.2× 74 0.3× 99 0.5× 180 1.2× 53 1.2k
Temeika L. Fairley United States 21 731 0.7× 200 0.4× 115 0.5× 56 0.3× 102 0.7× 36 1.3k
L A Brinton United States 25 842 0.8× 109 0.2× 239 1.0× 443 2.4× 823 5.5× 34 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Marion Nadel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marion Nadel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marion Nadel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marion Nadel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marion Nadel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marion Nadel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marion Nadel. The network helps show where Marion Nadel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marion Nadel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marion Nadel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marion Nadel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marion Nadel. Marion Nadel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Berkowitz, Zahava, Xingyou Zhang, Thomas B. Richards, et al.. (2021). Multilevel small area estimation for county-level prevalence of colorectal cancer screening test use in the United States using 2018 data. Annals of Epidemiology. 66. 20–27. 3 indexed citations
2.
Berkowitz, Zahava, Xingyou Zhang, Thomas B. Richards, et al.. (2018). Multilevel Small-Area Estimation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 27(3). 245–253. 33 indexed citations
3.
Subramanian, Sujha, Florence K. L. Tangka, Sonja Hoover, et al.. (2016). Recommendations From the International Colorectal Cancer Screening Network on the Evaluation of the Cost of Screening Programs. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 22(5). 461–465. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lieberman, David A., Douglas O. Faigel, Judith Logan, et al.. (2009). Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 69(3). 645–653. 75 indexed citations
5.
Seeff, Laura C., Amy DeGroff, Florence K. L. Tangka, et al.. (2008). Development of a federally funded demonstration colorectal cancer screening program.. PubMed. 5(2). A64–A64. 32 indexed citations
6.
Lieberman, David A., Marion Nadel, Robert A. Smith, et al.. (2007). Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 65(6). 757–766. 228 indexed citations
7.
Wu, Xiao‐Cheng, Vilma Cokkinides, Vivien W. Chen, et al.. (2006). Associations of subsite-specific colorectal cancer incidence rates and stage of disease at diagnosis with county-level poverty, by race and sex. Cancer. 107(S5). 1121–1127. 46 indexed citations
8.
9.
Selby, Joseph V., et al.. (2004). Acceptance of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. Cancer Detection and Prevention. 28(1). 43–51. 18 indexed citations
10.
Hall, H. Irene, Stephen K. Van Den Eeden, Dennis Tolsma, et al.. (2004). Testing for prostate and colorectal cancer: comparison of self-report and medical record audit. Preventive Medicine. 39(1). 27–35. 105 indexed citations
11.
Wardle, Jane, Kirsten McCaffery, Marion Nadel, & Wendy Atkin. (2003). Socioeconomic differences in cancer screening participation: comparing cognitive and psychosocial explanations. Social Science & Medicine. 59(2). 249–261. 130 indexed citations
12.
Klabunde, Carrie N., Paul Frame, Ann Meadow, et al.. (2003). A national survey of primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Preventive Medicine. 36(3). 352–362. 202 indexed citations
13.
Levin, Bernard, Robert A. Smith, Graham A. Colditz, et al.. (2002). Promoting early detection tests for colorectal carcinoma and adenomatous polyps. Cancer. 95(8). 1618–1628. 76 indexed citations
14.
McCaffery, Kirsten, Jane Wardle, Marion Nadel, & Wendy Atkin. (2002). Socioeconomic variation in participation in colorectal cancer screening. Journal of Medical Screening. 9(3). 104–108. 100 indexed citations
15.
Ashley, Olivia, Marion Nadel, & David F. Ransohoff. (2001). Achieving quality in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer. The American Journal of Medicine. 111(8). 643–653. 15 indexed citations
16.
Levin, Theodore R., et al.. (2001). Complications of screening sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology. 120(5). A65–A65. 4 indexed citations
17.
Caplan, Lee, Don Blackman, Marion Nadel, & Debra L. Monticciolo. (1999). Coding mammograms using the classification "probably benign finding--short interval follow-up suggested".. American Journal of Roentgenology. 172(2). 339–342. 38 indexed citations
18.
Hall, H. Irene, Daniel May, Robert Lew, Howard K. Koh, & Marion Nadel. (1997). Sun Protection Behaviors of the U.S. White Population. Preventive Medicine. 26(4). 401–407. 153 indexed citations
19.
Nadel, Marion, et al.. (1992). Age and Pap smear history as a basis for intervention strategy. Journal of Community Health. 17(2). 97–107. 12 indexed citations
20.
Tucker, T. C., et al.. (1992). Incidence of Dysplasia and Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix in an Appalachian Population. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 84(13). 1030–1032. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert J. Uhler Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adam B. Murphy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Gregory Harper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Edmundo Carvalho Mauad Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karen M. Linklater Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Ann Greene Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine Lejeune Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Louise F. Wilson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Temeika L. Fairley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L A Brinton
Rankless by CCL
2026