Maria G. Checton
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Kathryn GreeneKate Magsamen‐ConradMaria K. VenetisSmita C. BanerjeeZhanna BagdasarovJennifer A. TheissLeanne K. KnoblochKate Conrad
- Topics
- Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (14 papers)Family Support in Illness (8 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsIndia
In The Last Decade
Maria G. Checton
23 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Social Psychology 254
- Sociology and Political Science 167
- General Health Professions 163
- Clinical Psychology 140
- Oncology 56
Countries citing papers authored by Maria G. Checton
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria G. Checton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria G. Checton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria G. Checton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria G. Checton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria G. Checton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria G. Checton. The network helps show where Maria G. Checton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria G. Checton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria G. Checton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria G. Checton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria G. Checton. Maria G. Checton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 95 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Model of Disclosure Effect: General and Health-Related Disclosure in Existing Relationships | 2 |
| 19 | Assessing Information and Relationships in Disclosure Decisions: Testing an Integrated Model of Disclosure Decision-Making | 4 |
| 20 | 53 |
About Maria G. Checton
Maria G. Checton is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (14 papers), Family Support in Illness (8 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (254 citations), Applied Psychology (44 citations) and Clinical Psychology (140 citations). Maria G. Checton has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. Frequent co-authors include Kathryn Greene, Kate Magsamen‐Conrad, Maria K. Venetis, Smita C. Banerjee, Zhanna Bagdasarov, Jennifer A. Theiss, Leanne K. Knobloch, Kate Conrad, Alexandre Buckley de Meritens and Amanda Carpenter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Communication, Human Communication Research and Communication Monographs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.