Margaret T. Mandelson

6.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
63 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Margaret T. Mandelson is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret T. Mandelson has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Oncology, 15 papers in Surgery and 13 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Margaret T. Mandelson's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (19 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers). Margaret T. Mandelson is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (19 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (14 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (13 papers). Margaret T. Mandelson collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and New Zealand. Margaret T. Mandelson's co-authors include Stephen H. Taplin, Emily White, John D. Potter, Peggy L. Porter, Janet R. Daling, Carolyn M. Rutter, Laura Ichikawa, William E. Barlow, Nicole Urban and Stephen J. Rulyak and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Margaret T. Mandelson

61 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers

2000 803 citations Margaret T. Mandelson JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Margaret T. Mandelson United States	29	1.8k	1.1k	620	574	574	63	3.4k
Mette Kalager Norway	28	3.0k 1.7×	1.7k 1.5×	846 1.4×	299 0.5×	409 0.7×	101	4.0k
Ming‐Fang Yen Taiwan	20	1.2k 0.7×	375 0.3×	302 0.5×	458 0.8×	356 0.6×	40	2.5k
Eileen Rakovitch Canada	34	1.5k 0.8×	1.2k 1.1×	665 1.1×	294 0.5×	1.8k 3.1×	131	3.9k
Karthik Ghosh United States	30	1.3k 0.7×	815 0.8×	1.4k 2.3×	141 0.2×	1.4k 2.5×	81	3.4k
R. James Brenner United States	29	1.1k 0.6×	763 0.7×	1.3k 2.0×	121 0.2×	1.1k 1.9×	120	3.7k
Yann De Rycke France	30	1000 0.6×	959 0.9×	622 1.0×	212 0.4×	970 1.7×	105	3.3k
Vahit Özmen Türkiye	31	1.5k 0.8×	549 0.5×	836 1.3×	201 0.4×	1.1k 1.9×	196	3.1k
C. C. Boring United States	11	1.8k 1.0×	1.3k 1.2×	554 0.9×	464 0.8×	651 1.1×	12	4.4k
Kathleen R. Brandt United States	33	1.5k 0.8×	1.6k 1.5×	555 0.9×	89 0.2×	944 1.6×	74	3.3k
T. S. Squires United States	8	1.5k 0.8×	1.3k 1.2×	466 0.8×	422 0.7×	487 0.8×	8	3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret T. Mandelson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret T. Mandelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret T. Mandelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret T. Mandelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret T. Mandelson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret T. Mandelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret T. Mandelson. The network helps show where Margaret T. Mandelson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret T. Mandelson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret T. Mandelson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret T. Mandelson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret T. Mandelson. Margaret T. Mandelson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kanji, Zaheer, Alicia Edwards, Margaret T. Mandelson, et al.. (2018). Gemcitabine and Taxane Adjuvant Therapy with Chemoradiation in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Novel Strategy for Improved Survival?. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 25(4). 1052–1060. 4 indexed citations

Vishnu, Prakash, et al.. (2017). Guidelines in Clinical Practice: Appraisal of Quality Metrics in the Management of Newly Diagnosed Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Based on the American Society of Hematology Practice Improvement Module. Blood. 130. 5613. 1 indexed citations

Mendelsohn, Robin B., Sidney J. Winawer, Glenn Mills, et al.. (2017). Adenoma Prevalence in Blacks and Whites Having Equal Adherence To Screening Colonoscopy: The National Colonoscopy Study. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 15(9). 1469–1470. 4 indexed citations

Picozzi, Vincent J., Alicia Edwards, Margaret T. Mandelson, et al.. (2017). Five-Year Actual Overall Survival in Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Contemporary Single-Institution Experience from a Multidisciplinary Perspective. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 24(6). 1722–1730. 38 indexed citations

Bertens, Kimberly A., Margaret T. Mandelson, Bruce Lin, et al.. (2017). Adjuvant therapy (AT) following resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC): Are patients from rural, remote areas disadvantaged?. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 35(4_suppl). 373–373. 1 indexed citations

Edwards, Alicia, Margaret T. Mandelson, Hejin P. Hahn, et al.. (2016). Localized pancreatic cancer with positive peritoneal cytology as a sole manifestation of metastatic disease: a single-institution experience. The American Journal of Surgery. 213(1). 94–99. 8 indexed citations

Mandelson, Margaret T. & Vincent J. Picozzi. (2016). Resected pancreatic cancer (PC): Impact of adjuvant therapy (Rx) at a high-volume center (HVC) on overall survival (OS).. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34(4_suppl). 191–191. 3 indexed citations

Edwards, Alicia, Margaret T. Mandelson, Andrew S. Ross, et al.. (2015). Survival and clinical outcome after endoscopic duodenal stent placement for malignant gastric outlet obstruction: comparison of pancreatic cancer and nonpancreatic cancer. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 82(3). 460–468.e2. 45 indexed citations

Adams, Scott V., Polly A. Newcomb, Andrea N. Burnett‐Hartman, et al.. (2011). Circulating 25-Hydroxyvitamin-D and Risk of Colorectal Adenomas and Hyperplastic Polyps. Nutrition and Cancer. 63(3). 319–326. 24 indexed citations

10.

Chubak, Jessica, Denise M. Boudreau, Stephen J. Rulyak, & Margaret T. Mandelson. (2010). Colorectal cancer risk in relation to antidepressant medication use. International Journal of Cancer. 128(1). 227–232. 49 indexed citations

11.

Wernli, Karen J., Polly A. Newcomb, Yinghui Wang, et al.. (2010). Body size, IGF and growth hormone polymorphisms, and colorectal adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Growth Hormone & IGF Research. 20(4). 305–309. 26 indexed citations

12.

Fesinmeyer, Megan D., Emily White, Federico M. Farin, et al.. (2010). Association of Diabetes Susceptibility Gene Calpain-10 with Pancreatic Cancer Among Smokers. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 41(3). 203–208. 14 indexed citations

13.

Rulyak, Stephen J., David A. Lieberman, Edward H. Wagner, & Margaret T. Mandelson. (2007). Outcome of Follow-up Colon Examination Among a Population-Based Cohort of Colorectal Cancer Patients. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 5(4). 470–476. 33 indexed citations

14.

Fulton‐Kehoe, Deborah, et al.. (2006). Use of antidepressant medications in relation to the incidence of breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 94(7). 1071–1078. 36 indexed citations

15.

Hiatt, Robert A., Jane Wardle, Sally W. Vernon, et al.. (2004). Workgroup IV: public education. UICC International Workshop on Facilitating Screening for Colorectal Cancer, Oslo, Norway (29 and 30 June 2002). Annals of Oncology. 16(1). 38–41. 9 indexed citations

16.

Oestreicher, Nina, Emily White, Constance D. Lehman, et al.. (2002). Predictors of Sensitivity of Clinical Breast Examination (CBE). Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 76(1). 73–81. 53 indexed citations

17.

Mandelson, Margaret T., et al.. (2000). A record-based evaluation of induced abortion and breast cancer risk (United States). Cancer Causes & Control. 11(9). 777–781. 15 indexed citations

18.

Mandelson, Margaret T., et al.. (1999). Comparison of Self-reported Fecal Occult Blood Testing with Automated Laboratory Records among Older Women in a Health Maintenance Organization. American Journal of Epidemiology. 150(6). 617–621. 73 indexed citations

19.

White, Emily, Priscilla Velentgas, Margaret T. Mandelson, et al.. (1998). Variation in Mammographic Breast Density by Time in Menstrual Cycle Among Women Aged 40-49 Years. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 90(12). 906–910. 135 indexed citations

20.

Mandelson, Margaret T., Christopher Maden, & Janet R. Daling. (1992). Low birth weight in relation to multiple induced abortions.. American Journal of Public Health. 82(3). 391–394. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact