Margaret McNeil

772 total citations
7 papers, 184 citations indexed

About

Margaret McNeil is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Nephrology. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret McNeil has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 184 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Nephrology. Recurrent topics in Margaret McNeil's work include Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Margaret McNeil is often cited by papers focused on Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (2 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers). Margaret McNeil collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Margaret McNeil's co-authors include Jeannette Milgrom, Alan W. Gemmill, Paul R. Martin, Daniel Martín, Helder Filipe, Farid Froghi, Rachel Burnish, Brian R Davidson, Jeshika Singh and Andrew F. Cumpstey and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of Clinical Psychology and Trials.

In The Last Decade

Margaret McNeil

7 papers receiving 176 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret McNeil United Kingdom 4 138 120 63 37 24 7 184
Hannah Gordon Australia 6 146 1.1× 76 0.6× 15 0.2× 50 1.4× 30 1.3× 14 184
Lorenzo Severino Italy 6 213 1.5× 110 0.9× 51 0.8× 61 1.6× 49 2.0× 15 324
H. Cookson United Kingdom 6 93 0.7× 51 0.4× 15 0.2× 51 1.4× 38 1.6× 6 247
Alexandra Roddy Mitchell Australia 5 107 0.8× 40 0.3× 13 0.2× 62 1.7× 24 1.0× 9 161
Janine Lynch United Kingdom 4 144 1.0× 67 0.6× 23 0.4× 40 1.1× 35 1.5× 8 173
Leesa Van Niekerk Australia 12 121 0.9× 57 0.5× 31 0.5× 55 1.5× 12 0.5× 34 350
Martien Snellen Australia 12 331 2.4× 162 1.4× 40 0.6× 96 2.6× 17 0.7× 17 406
Juana María Vázquez-Lara Spain 10 118 0.9× 52 0.4× 14 0.2× 42 1.1× 13 0.5× 28 221
Susanne Somerville Australia 5 221 1.6× 143 1.2× 54 0.9× 92 2.5× 34 1.4× 6 252
Sarah Dib United Kingdom 7 144 1.0× 63 0.5× 21 0.3× 68 1.8× 101 4.2× 17 272

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret McNeil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret McNeil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret McNeil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret McNeil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret McNeil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret McNeil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret McNeil. The network helps show where Margaret McNeil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret McNeil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret McNeil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret McNeil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret McNeil. Margaret McNeil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Vindrola‐Padros, Cecilia, Farid Froghi, Helder Filipe, et al.. (2023). The integration of rapid qualitative research in clinical trials: reflections from the ward-based goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) in acute pancreatitis feasibility trial. Trials. 24(1). 227–227. 2 indexed citations
2.
Froghi, Farid, Zacharias Anastasiou, Rahul Koti, et al.. (2022). Effect of post-operative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on organ function after orthotopic liver transplantation: Secondary outcome analysis of the COLT randomised control trial. International Journal of Surgery. 99. 106265–106265. 2 indexed citations
3.
Martín, Daniel, Margaret McNeil, Chris Brew‐Graves, et al.. (2021). A feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 22(4). 280–287. 7 indexed citations
4.
Froghi, Farid, Fiammetta Soggiu, Federico Ricciardi, et al.. (2019). Ward-based Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy (GDFT) in Acute Pancreatitis (GAP) trial: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 9(10). e028783–e028783. 8 indexed citations
5.
Martín, Daniel, Chris Brew‐Graves, Neil McCartan, et al.. (2019). Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 9(1). e021674–e021674. 5 indexed citations
6.
Froghi, Farid, Rahul Koti, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, et al.. (2018). Cardiac output Optimisation following Liver Transplant (COLT) trial: study protocol for a feasibility  randomised controlled trial. Trials. 19(1). 170–170. 3 indexed citations
7.
Milgrom, Jeannette, et al.. (2005). A randomized controlled trial of psychological interventions for postnatal depression. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(4). 529–542. 157 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026