Margaret McDonald
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Infectious Diseases
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher BagleyPreeta K. KuttyKen KomatsuPaul A. RotaRebecca SunenshineIsmael R. Ortega‐SanchezS. AndersonShey‐Ying Chen
- Topics
- Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers)Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Margaret McDonald
25 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Epidemiology 164
- Clinical Psychology 154
- Health 128
- Infectious Diseases 101
- General Health Professions 100
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret McDonald
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret McDonald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret McDonald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret McDonald more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret McDonald
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret McDonald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret McDonald. The network helps show where Margaret McDonald may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret McDonald
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret McDonald. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret McDonald based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret McDonald. Margaret McDonald is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 97 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 138 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | Women in development | 2 |
| 19 | Admissions of injection drug users to drug abuse treatment following HIV counseling and testing. | 11 |
| 20 | 36 |
About Margaret McDonald
Margaret McDonald is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers), Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (128 citations), General Psychology (16 citations) and Clinical Psychology (154 citations). Margaret McDonald has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Bagley, Preeta K. Kutty, Ken Komatsu, Paul A. Rota, Rebecca Sunenshine, Ismael R. Ortega‐Sanchez, S. Anderson, Shey‐Ying Chen, Gregory L. Armstrong and Jane McCusker. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Infectious Diseases, AIDS and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.