Margaret L. Polinsky

2.4k total citations
24 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Margaret L. Polinsky is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret L. Polinsky has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Oncology, 9 papers in Epidemiology and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Margaret L. Polinsky's work include Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (4 papers). Margaret L. Polinsky is often cited by papers focused on Cancer survivorship and care (13 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (8 papers) and Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (4 papers). Margaret L. Polinsky collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Margaret L. Polinsky's co-authors include Patricia A. Ganz, Laura Petersen, Yih‐Ing Hser, C. A. C. Schag, Peter Ganz, Cyndie Coscarelli Schag, J. Jack Lee, Barbara Kahn, Anne Coscarelli and Margaret Maglione and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

In The Last Decade

Margaret L. Polinsky

24 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret L. Polinsky United States 16 1.2k 614 483 426 343 24 2.0k
Kimlin T. Ashing‐Giwa United States 31 2.0k 1.6× 1.1k 1.8× 631 1.3× 695 1.6× 250 0.7× 48 2.9k
Mary Jane Esplen Canada 29 859 0.7× 562 0.9× 459 1.0× 300 0.7× 106 0.3× 105 2.5k
Betina R. Yanez United States 24 1.1k 0.9× 385 0.6× 423 0.9× 377 0.9× 98 0.3× 79 1.9k
Lone Ross Denmark 27 1.1k 0.9× 479 0.8× 512 1.1× 409 1.0× 85 0.2× 62 1.9k
Karen F. Bowman United States 21 1.0k 0.8× 514 0.8× 546 1.1× 328 0.8× 70 0.2× 43 1.7k
Karen Hassey Dow United States 17 1.4k 1.1× 428 0.7× 781 1.6× 224 0.5× 79 0.2× 34 2.0k
Diana D. Jeffery United States 18 958 0.8× 354 0.6× 354 0.7× 249 0.6× 136 0.4× 38 1.9k
Alyson B. Moadel United States 22 740 0.6× 193 0.3× 245 0.5× 314 0.7× 107 0.3× 41 2.1k
Dorte Gilså Hansen Denmark 25 774 0.6× 333 0.5× 343 0.7× 361 0.8× 119 0.3× 96 1.8k
Teresa L. Deshields United States 25 954 0.8× 404 0.7× 523 1.1× 659 1.5× 56 0.2× 49 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret L. Polinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret L. Polinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret L. Polinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret L. Polinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret L. Polinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret L. Polinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret L. Polinsky. The network helps show where Margaret L. Polinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret L. Polinsky

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret L. Polinsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret L. Polinsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret L. Polinsky. Margaret L. Polinsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (2013). Development and Validation of a Wraparound Parent Partner Fidelity Tool. Social Work Research. 37(2). 111–120. 3 indexed citations
2.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (2011). Parents Anonymous® Outcome Evaluation: Promising Findings for Child Maltreatment Reduction. 1(1). 33–47. 4 indexed citations
3.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (2010). Preventing child abuse and neglect: a national evaluation of Parents Anonymous groups.. PubMed. 89(6). 43–62. 12 indexed citations
4.
Hser, Yih‐Ing, Margaret L. Polinsky, Margaret Maglione, & M. Douglas Anglin. (1999). Matching Clients’ Needs With Drug Treatment Services. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 16(4). 299–305. 113 indexed citations
5.
Grella, Christine E., et al.. (1999). Characteristics of Women-Only and Mixed-Gender Drug Abuse Treatment Programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 17(1-2). 37–44. 68 indexed citations
6.
Polinsky, Margaret L., Yih‐Ing Hser, & Christine E. Grella. (1998). Consideration of special populations in the drug treatment system of a large metropolitan area. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 25(1). 7–21. 10 indexed citations
7.
Hser, Yih‐Ing, et al.. (1998). Predicting Drug Treatment Entry Among Treatment-Seeking Individuals. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 15(3). 213–220. 169 indexed citations
8.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (1998). Exploratory cluster analyses of drug users' needs at assessment and follow-up. Social Work Research. 22(3). 152–163. 2 indexed citations
9.
Zabora, James, Christina G. Blanchard, Cleora S. Roberts, et al.. (1997). Prevalence of Psychological Distress Among Cancer Patients Across the Disease Continuum. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 15(2). 73–87. 131 indexed citations
10.
Ganz, Patricia A., et al.. (1996). Breast cancer survivors: Psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 38(2). 183–199. 412 indexed citations
11.
Polinsky, Margaret L.. (1994). Functional Status of Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors:. Health & Social Work. 19(3). 165–173. 115 indexed citations
12.
Schag, C. A. C., et al.. (1993). Characteristics of women at risk for psychosocial distress in the year after breast cancer.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 11(4). 783–793. 220 indexed citations
13.
Ganz, Peter, et al.. (1993). Predicting Psychosocial Risk in Patients With Breast Cancer. Medical Care. 31(5). 419–431. 135 indexed citations
14.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (1992). Intimacy and Sexuality After Cancer Treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 10(1). 19–33. 35 indexed citations
16.
Ganz, Patricia A., J. Jack Lee, Myung‐Shin Sim, Margaret L. Polinsky, & C. A. C. Schag. (1992). Exploring the influence of multiple variables on the relationship of age to quality of life in women WITH BREAST CANCER. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 45(5). 473–485. 85 indexed citations
17.
Polinsky, Margaret L., et al.. (1991). Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of a Case Management Program for Cancer Patients. Health & Social Work. 16(3). 176–183. 22 indexed citations
18.
Ganz, Patricia A., Margaret L. Polinsky, C. A. C. Schag, & Richard Heinrich. (1989). Rehabilitation of Patients with Primary Breast Cancer: Assessing the Impact of Adjuvant Therapy. Recent results in cancer research. 115. 244–254. 14 indexed citations
19.
Ganz, Patricia A., Cyndie Coscarelli Schag, Margaret L. Polinsky, Richard Heinrich, & Virginia F. Flack. (1987). Rehabilitation needs and breast cancer: The first month after primary therapy. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 10(3). 243–253. 55 indexed citations
20.
Ganz, Patricia A., et al.. (1986). A Comprehensive Approach to the Assessment of Cancer Patients' Rehabilitation Needs. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 4(3). 27–42. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026