Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout

551 total citations
23 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 6 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout's work include Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (6 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers). Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout is often cited by papers focused on Innovation Policy and R&D (10 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (6 papers) and Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (5 papers). Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout's co-authors include Neeraj Sood, Krishna B. Kumar, Krishna Kumar, Neeraj Sood, Helen Wu, Susan M. Gates, Xiaohui Zhuo, Eric Sun, Christopher Lau and Steven Garber and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Public Economics and Industrial and Labor Relations Review.

In The Last Decade

Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout

21 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout United States	8	175	84	32	30	24	23	288
Teresa Isabelle Daza Campbell United States	6	60 0.3×	114 1.4×	17 0.5×	23 0.8×	10 0.4×	6	306
Michael E. Gluck United States	7	149 0.9×	159 1.9×	101 3.2×	11 0.4×	63 2.6×	12	465
Laure Turner France	5	87 0.5×	40 0.5×	11 0.3×	24 0.8×		8	190
Melanie Fox-Kean United States	5	272 1.6×	114 1.4×	17 0.5×	35 1.2×		6	392
Sudip Chaudhuri India	8	155 0.9×	63 0.8×	55 1.7×	20 0.7×	4 0.2×	19	233
Christopher Anthony Cotropia United States	8	165 0.9×	176 2.1×	48 1.5×	7 0.2×	1 0.0×	44	292
Niels Philipsen Netherlands	7	100 0.6×	5 0.1×	7 0.2×	22 0.7×	5 0.2×	44	199
Lawrence M DeBrock United States	8	212 1.2×	25 0.3×	3 0.1×	69 2.3×	3 0.1×	21	270
Timothy Perri United States	8	102 0.6×	12 0.1×	4 0.1×	53 1.8×		27	241
Tania Voon Australia	9	46 0.3×	23 0.3×	18 0.6×	29 1.0×	3 0.1×	103	345

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout. The network helps show where Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout. Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., et al.. (2022). Incentivizing STEM participation: Evidence from the SMART Grant Program. Southern Economic Journal. 89(2). 373–405. 1 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2022). The Affordable Care Act and Women’s Self-Employment in the United States. Feminist Economics. 29(1). 174–204. 2 indexed citations

Park, Jihyun, Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout, Ralf Krestel, Eric Nalisnick, & Padhraic Smyth. (2016). Analyzing NIH Funding Patterns over Time with Statistical Text Analysis.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2015). Why are some foreign-born workers more entrepreneurial than others?. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 41(6). 1327–1353. 16 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., et al.. (2015). When going gets tough: Barriers and motivations affecting arts attendance. 1–82. 28 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., Krishna Kumar, & Neeraj Sood. (2014). University R&D Funding Strategies in a Changing Federal Funding Environment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., Krishna B. Kumar, Christopher Lau, & Neeraj Sood. (2014). The effect of federal research funding on formation of university-firm biopharmaceutical alliances. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 40(5). 859–876. 5 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., et al.. (2014). University R&D Funding Strategies in a Changing Federal Funding Environment. Science and Public Policy. 42(3). 355–368. 14 indexed citations

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2014). Understanding the Gender Gap in STEM Fields Entrepreneurship. SSRN Electronic Journal. 35 indexed citations

10.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., et al.. (2013). Are Graduate Students Rational? Evidence from the Market for Biomedical Scientists. PLoS ONE. 8(12). e82759–e82759. 15 indexed citations

11.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2012). Does Targeted, Disease‐Specific Public Research Funding Influence Pharmaceutical Innovation?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 31(3). 641–660. 29 indexed citations

12.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E. & Neeraj Sood. (2012). Market size and innovation: Effects of Medicare Part D on pharmaceutical research and development. Journal of Public Economics. 97. 327–336. 109 indexed citations

13.

Garber, Steven, et al.. (2011). Challenges to Value-Enhancing Innovation in Health Care Delivery. 1 indexed citations

14.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2010). Essays on Government Policy and Pharmaceutical Innovation - Dissertation Executive Summary. SSRN Electronic Journal.

15.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., Krishna Kumar, & Neeraj Sood. (2009). Federal Life Sciences Funding and University R&D. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

16.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., Krishna B. Kumar, & Neeraj Sood. (2009). Federal Life Sciences Funding and University R&D. NBER Working Paper No. 15146.. National Bureau of Economic Research. 9 indexed citations

17.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E.. (2009). Essays on Government Policy and Pharmaceutical Innovation. 3 indexed citations

18.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., et al.. (2009). Innovation in Academe. 1 indexed citations

19.

Blume‐Kohout, Margaret E., Krishna B. Kumar, & Neeraj Sood. (2008). The Impact of Federal Life Science Funding on University R&D:. 1 indexed citations

20.

Sood, Neeraj, Eric Sun, Xiaohui Zhuo, & Margaret E. Blume‐Kohout. (2008). Potential Effects of Introducing Behind the Counter Drugs. RAND Corporation eBooks. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact