Margaret Brown
- Education top 2%
- Media Technology top 2%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Computer Science Applications top 5%
- Co-authors
- Stephen DraperSusan StuartFiona HendersonErica McAteerQuintin CuttsDouglas M. NeilDietmar KüchemannColin Foster
- Topics
- Online and Blended Learning (6 papers)Innovations in Educational Methods (4 papers)Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Margaret Brown
16 papers receiving 624 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Education 615
- Media Technology 251
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
- Information Systems 111
- Computer Science Applications 100
Countries citing papers authored by Margaret Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret Brown. The network helps show where Margaret Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret Brown. Margaret Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evidence for review of mathematics teaching: improving mathematics in key stages two and three: evidence review | 5 |
| 2 | Evidence for Review of Mathematics Teaching: Improving Mathematics in Key Stages Two and Three | 8 |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | Developing geometrical reasoning | 3 |
| 6 | 104 | |
| 7 | 406 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 105 | |
| 14 | An Investigation of a Spelling Intervention with Learning-Disabled Elementary School Students. | 4 |
| 15 | "Is it an 'Add' Miss?" Part 1. | 5 |
| 16 | 1 |
About Margaret Brown
Margaret Brown is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Computer Science Applications and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 16 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Online and Blended Learning (6 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (4 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (251 citations), Education (615 citations) and Computer Science Applications (100 citations). Margaret Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Draper, Susan Stuart, Fiona Henderson, Erica McAteer, Quintin Cutts, Douglas M. Neil, Dietmar Küchemann, Colin Foster, Jeremy Hodgen and Phil Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Education, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning and Software Practice and Experience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.