Margaret A. Moote

1.1k total citations
10 papers, 738 citations indexed

About

Margaret A. Moote is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Margaret A. Moote has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 738 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 5 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 2 papers in Environmental Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Margaret A. Moote's work include American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers). Margaret A. Moote is often cited by papers focused on American Environmental and Regional History (3 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (2 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (2 papers). Margaret A. Moote collaborates with scholars based in United States. Margaret A. Moote's co-authors include Alexander Conley, Mitchel P. McClaran, Hanna J. Cortner, Cecil R. Schwalbe, Robert G. Varady, Robert Merideth, Gregg B. Walker and Beverly A. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Landscape and Urban Planning, Environmental Management and Society & Natural Resources.

In The Last Decade

Margaret A. Moote

9 papers receiving 611 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Margaret A. Moote United States 7 441 179 151 108 97 10 738
Marc Gramberger Netherlands 10 550 1.2× 111 0.6× 132 0.9× 128 1.2× 80 0.8× 10 920
Wendy Proctor Australia 14 353 0.8× 213 1.2× 110 0.7× 166 1.5× 98 1.0× 23 820
Craig Anthony Arnold United States 13 454 1.0× 204 1.1× 214 1.4× 93 0.9× 93 1.0× 33 866
María Mancilla García Sweden 14 461 1.0× 131 0.7× 170 1.1× 46 0.4× 125 1.3× 39 848
Lisa Robins Australia 13 255 0.6× 86 0.5× 115 0.8× 86 0.8× 60 0.6× 27 630
Melinda Harm Benson United States 14 478 1.1× 188 1.1× 253 1.7× 97 0.9× 110 1.1× 29 882
Catrien Termeer Netherlands 9 536 1.2× 134 0.7× 365 2.4× 92 0.9× 49 0.5× 11 928
Suzanne Hoverman Australia 10 322 0.7× 99 0.6× 146 1.0× 72 0.7× 45 0.5× 13 680
Forrest Fleischman United States 18 713 1.6× 194 1.1× 146 1.0× 180 1.7× 166 1.7× 39 1.0k
Heidi Huber‐Stearns United States 15 583 1.3× 94 0.5× 148 1.0× 96 0.9× 141 1.5× 49 732

Countries citing papers authored by Margaret A. Moote

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Margaret A. Moote's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margaret A. Moote with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margaret A. Moote more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Margaret A. Moote

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margaret A. Moote. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margaret A. Moote. The network helps show where Margaret A. Moote may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margaret A. Moote

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margaret A. Moote. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margaret A. Moote based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Margaret A. Moote. Margaret A. Moote is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Conley, Alexander & Margaret A. Moote. (2003). Evaluating Collaborative Natural ResourceManagement. Society & Natural Resources. 16(5). 371–386. 378 indexed citations
2.
Moote, Margaret A., et al.. (2001). Process. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 12(3-4). 97–116. 7 indexed citations
3.
Varady, Robert G., Margaret A. Moote, & Robert Merideth. (2000). Water Management Options for the Upper San Pedro Basin: Assessing the Social and Institutional Landscape. Natural resources journal. 40(2). 223–235. 6 indexed citations
4.
Cortner, Hanna J. & Margaret A. Moote. (2000). Ensuring the common for the goose: Implementing effective watershed policies. 13. 247–256. 1 indexed citations
5.
Cortner, Hanna J., et al.. (1998). Institutions matter: the need to address the institutional challenges of ecosystem management. Landscape and Urban Planning. 40(1-3). 159–166. 88 indexed citations
6.
Moote, Margaret A., et al.. (1997). RESEARCH: Theory in Practice: Applying Participatory Democracy Theory to Public Land Planning. Environmental Management. 21(6). 877–889. 125 indexed citations
7.
Moote, Margaret A. & Mitchel P. McClaran. (1997). Viewpoint: Implications of Participatory Democracy for Public Land Planning. Journal of Range Management. 50(5). 473–473. 42 indexed citations
8.
Moote, Margaret A.. (1995). Changing models of administrative decision-making: Public participation in public land planning. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 4 indexed citations
9.
Cortner, Hanna J. & Margaret A. Moote. (1994). Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management. 18(2). 167–173. 77 indexed citations
10.
Moote, Margaret A., et al.. (1993). The Endangered Species Act at twenty: An analytical survey of Federal endangered species. Natural resources journal. 33(4). 1027–1075. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026