Marcus Sperling

853 total citations
30 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Marcus Sperling is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Geometry and Topology and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Marcus Sperling has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 17 papers in Geometry and Topology and 10 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Marcus Sperling's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (28 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (11 papers). Marcus Sperling is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (28 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (11 papers) and Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (11 papers). Marcus Sperling collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and Austria. Marcus Sperling's co-authors include Alexander Voigt, Dominik Stöckinger, Harold Steinacker, Amihay Hanany, Antoine Bourget, Babak Haghighat, Jin Chen, Satoshi Nawata, Alexander D. Popov and Olaf Lechtenfeld and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

Marcus Sperling

29 papers receiving 461 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Marcus Sperling United Kingdom	12	407	155	136	106	50	30	473
Constantinos Papageorgakis United Kingdom	13	370 0.9×	222 1.4×	66 0.5×	197 1.9×	34 0.7×	32	423
Rutger H. Boels Germany	16	641 1.6×	187 1.2×	55 0.4×	200 1.9×	29 0.6×	27	670
Antoine Bourget United Kingdom	12	286 0.7×	100 0.6×	121 0.9×	46 0.4×	43 0.9×	18	343
Sylvain Lacroix Germany	10	229 0.6×	176 1.1×	179 1.3×	34 0.3×	46 0.9×	22	285
Chuan-Jie Zhu China	11	342 0.8×	98 0.6×	61 0.4×	87 0.8×	25 0.5×	28	393
Simone Giacomelli Italy	14	560 1.4×	236 1.5×	218 1.6×	131 1.2×	67 1.3×	31	641
Matthew Buican United Kingdom	15	585 1.4×	197 1.3×	219 1.6×	172 1.6×	43 0.9×	37	667
Dmitry Melnikov Russia	11	246 0.6×	53 0.3×	70 0.5×	149 1.4×	56 1.1×	29	333
Andrea L. Guerrieri Italy	13	414 1.0×	60 0.4×	36 0.3×	162 1.5×	27 0.5×	20	460
V.N. Velizhanin Russia	15	970 2.4×	156 1.0×	81 0.6×	201 1.9×	32 0.6×	34	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Sperling

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Sperling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Sperling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Sperling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Sperling

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Sperling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Sperling. The network helps show where Marcus Sperling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marcus Sperling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marcus Sperling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marcus Sperling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marcus Sperling. Marcus Sperling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sperling, Marcus, et al.. (2025). Pathway to decay and fission of orthosymplectic quiver theories. Physical review. D. 112(2).

Hanany, Amihay, et al.. (2024). Actions on the quiver: discrete quotients on the Coulomb branch. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2024(5). 5 indexed citations

Bourget, Antoine, et al.. (2024). Higgs branch RG flows via decay and fission. Physical review. D. 109(12). 11 indexed citations

Sperling, Marcus, et al.. (2024). Unraveling T duality: Magnetic quivers in rank-zero little string theories. Physical review. D. 110(12). 2 indexed citations

Gu, Jie, Yunfeng Jiang, & Marcus Sperling. (2023). Rational $Q$-systems, Higgsing and mirror symmetry. SciPost Physics. 14(3). 13 indexed citations

Nawata, Satoshi, et al.. (2023). 3d $\mathcal{N}=4$ mirror symmetry with 1-form symmetry. SciPost Physics. 15(1). 9 indexed citations

Sperling, Marcus, et al.. (2022). Balanced B and D-type orthosymplectic quivers — magnetic quivers for product theories. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(4). 20 indexed citations

Hanany, Amihay & Marcus Sperling. (2022). Magnetic quivers and negatively charged branes. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(11). 15 indexed citations

Nawata, Satoshi, et al.. (2022). Magnetic quivers and line defects — On a duality between 3d $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 4 unitary and orthosymplectic quivers. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(2). 15 indexed citations

10.

Chen, Jin, Babak Haghighat, Hee‐Cheol Kim, et al.. (2022). Elliptic quantum curves of 6d SO(N) theories. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2022(3). 9 indexed citations

11.

Chen, Jin, et al.. (2021). Fibre-base duality of 5d KK theories. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 9 indexed citations

12.

Chen, Jin, Babak Haghighat, Hee‐Cheol Kim, & Marcus Sperling. (2021). Elliptic quantum curves of class $$ {\mathcal{S}}_k $$. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2021(3). 7 indexed citations

13.

Chen, Jin, Babak Haghighat, Shuwei Liu, & Marcus Sperling. (2020). 4d $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0). Journal of High Energy Physics. 2020(1). 6 indexed citations

14.

Bourget, Antoine, et al.. (2020). The Higgs mechanism — Hasse diagrams for symplectic singularities. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2020(1). 55 indexed citations

15.

Chen, Jin, Babak Haghighat, Shuwei Liu, & Marcus Sperling. (2019). 4d N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 1 from 6d D-type N $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = (1, 0). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 10 indexed citations

16.

Sperling, Marcus, et al.. (2017). Instantons on Calabi-Yau and hyper-Kähler cones. Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover). 1 indexed citations

17.

Lechtenfeld, Olaf, Alexander D. Popov, Marcus Sperling, & Richard J. Szabo. (2015). Sasakian quiver gauge theories and instantons on cones over lens 5-spaces. Nuclear Physics B. 899. 848–903. 5 indexed citations

18.

Ivanova, T. A., et al.. (2014). Instantons on sine-cones over Sasakian manifolds. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 90(6). 9 indexed citations

19.

Sperling, Marcus, Dominik Stöckinger, & Alexander Voigt. (2014). Renormalization of vacuum expectation values in spontaneously broken gauge theories: two-loop results. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2014(1). 59 indexed citations

20.

Sperling, Marcus, Dominik Stöckinger, & Alexander Voigt. (2013). Renormalization of vacuum expectation values in spontaneously broken gauge theories. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2013(7). 82 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact