Marcelo Gleiser
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 0.5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Co-authors
- Rudnei O. RamosEdward W. KolbNikitas StamatopoulosArjun BereraDamian SowinskiRichard WatkinsEdmund J. CopelandHans‐Reinhard Müller
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (58 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (34 papers)Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
Marcelo Gleiser
107 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.8k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.4k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 906
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 768
- Condensed Matter Physics 267
Countries citing papers authored by Marcelo Gleiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Marcelo Gleiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcelo Gleiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcelo Gleiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marcelo Gleiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcelo Gleiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcelo Gleiser. The network helps show where Marcelo Gleiser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marcelo Gleiser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marcelo Gleiser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marcelo Gleiser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marcelo Gleiser. Marcelo Gleiser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | Emergence of Complex Spatio-Temporal Order in Nonlinear Field Theories | 1 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | 267 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | Dynamical Precursor Model for the Onset of Percolation | 1 |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | The dancing universe : from creation myths to the big bang / Marcelo | 1 |
| 20 | 234 |
About Marcelo Gleiser
Marcelo Gleiser is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 110 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (58 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (34 papers) and Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.8k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (906 citations). Marcelo Gleiser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Rudnei O. Ramos, Edward W. Kolb, Nikitas Stamatopoulos, Arjun Berera, Damian Sowinski, Richard Watkins, Edmund J. Copeland, Hans‐Reinhard Müller, Graciela B. Gelmini and J.G. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and The Astrophysical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.