Malcolm L. Reed

761 total citations
10 papers, 528 citations indexed

About

Malcolm L. Reed is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Malcolm L. Reed has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 528 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Malcolm L. Reed's work include Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers). Malcolm L. Reed is often cited by papers focused on Biocrusts and Microbial Ecology (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers) and Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (2 papers). Malcolm L. Reed collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Malcolm L. Reed's co-authors include Bernard R. Glick, D. Graham, Paul J. Milham, Snow Barlow, Jann P. Conroy, Katherine Richardson, John A. Raven, Nina M. Griffiths, Howard Griffiths and Brian D. Patterson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Malcolm L. Reed

10 papers receiving 477 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Malcolm L. Reed Australia 9 316 156 77 67 65 10 528
Marie‐Louise Champigny France 10 427 1.4× 310 2.0× 96 1.2× 56 0.8× 46 0.7× 16 673
A. Moyse France 9 172 0.5× 90 0.6× 125 1.6× 56 0.8× 45 0.7× 20 409
Stein Nilsen Norway 13 261 0.8× 150 1.0× 22 0.3× 45 0.7× 30 0.5× 29 393
R. J. Helder Netherlands 10 276 0.9× 124 0.8× 53 0.7× 30 0.4× 99 1.5× 22 472
Herbert M. Hull United States 13 455 1.4× 80 0.5× 85 1.1× 50 0.7× 56 0.9× 30 747
Stephanie McCaffery Australia 7 528 1.7× 481 3.1× 76 1.0× 90 1.3× 84 1.3× 8 815
Carl‐Magnus Larsson Sweden 18 579 1.8× 129 0.8× 61 0.8× 237 3.5× 61 0.9× 35 959
Ichiro Aiga Japan 11 389 1.2× 119 0.8× 103 1.3× 148 2.2× 34 0.5× 49 576
L.A. Garrard United States 16 548 1.7× 181 1.2× 81 1.1× 16 0.2× 90 1.4× 35 711
Yan‐Ping Cen Canada 9 591 1.9× 197 1.3× 150 1.9× 138 2.1× 72 1.1× 13 799

Countries citing papers authored by Malcolm L. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm L. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm L. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm L. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Malcolm L. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm L. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm L. Reed. The network helps show where Malcolm L. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malcolm L. Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malcolm L. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malcolm L. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Malcolm L. Reed. Malcolm L. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Reed, Malcolm L., Barry G. Warner, & Bernard R. Glick. (2005). Plant Growth–Promoting Bacteria Facilitate the Growth of the Common Reed Phragmites australisin the Presence of Copper or Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Current Microbiology. 51(6). 425–429. 41 indexed citations
2.
Reed, Malcolm L. & Bernard R. Glick. (2005). Growth of canola (Brassica napus) in the presence of plant growth-promoting bacteria and either copper or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 51(12). 1061–1069. 108 indexed citations
3.
Wright, Ian J., H. T. Clifford, R. Kidson, et al.. (2000). A survey of seed and seedling characters in 1744 Australian dicotyledon species: cross-species trait correlations and correlated trait-shifts within evolutionary lineages. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 69(4). 521–547. 33 indexed citations
4.
Roughley, R. J., et al.. (1993). Screening of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii for adaptation to acid and neutral soils using a selective agar medium. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 25(10). 1463–1464. 6 indexed citations
5.
Conroy, Jann P., Paul J. Milham, Malcolm L. Reed, & Snow Barlow. (1990). Increases in Phosphorus Requirements for CO2-Enriched Pine Species. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 92(4). 977–982. 76 indexed citations
6.
Graham, D., et al.. (1984). Chemical Properties, Distribution, and Physiology of Plant and Algal Carbonic Anhydrases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 429(1). 222–237. 69 indexed citations
7.
Richardson, Katherine, Howard Griffiths, Malcolm L. Reed, John A. Raven, & Nina M. Griffiths. (1984). Inorganic carbon assimilation in the Isoetids, Isoetes lacustris L. and Lobelia dortmanna L.. Oecologia. 61(1). 115–121. 92 indexed citations
8.
Reed, Malcolm L.. (1979). Intracellular Location of Carbonate Dehydratase (Carbonic Anhydrase) in Leaf Tissue. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY. 63(1). 216–217. 17 indexed citations
10.
Graham, D. & Malcolm L. Reed. (1971). Carbonic Anhydrase and the Regulation of Photosynthesis. Nature New Biology. 231(20). 81–83. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026