Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Noninvasive evaluation of pulmonary hypertension by a pulsed Doppler technique.
This map shows the geographic impact of Makoto Inoue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Makoto Inoue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Makoto Inoue more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Makoto Inoue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Makoto Inoue. The network helps show where Makoto Inoue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Makoto Inoue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Makoto Inoue.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Makoto Inoue based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Makoto Inoue. Makoto Inoue is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Shinoda, Hajime, et al.. (2003). Surgical treatment of choroidal hemorrhage. 57(13). 1803–1807.1 indexed citations
10.
Shirai, Toshiyuki, Hideki Dewa, M. Kando, et al.. (1995). System of the 100 MeV Electron Injector for the KSR. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 73(1). 78–89.1 indexed citations
11.
Hiramoto, Kazuo, et al.. (1995). A ferrite-loaded, untuned cavity with multiple power feeding. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 73(1). 41–49.3 indexed citations
12.
Hiramoto, Kazuo, et al.. (1995). A Compact Proton Synchrotron with a Combined Function Lattice Dedicated for Medical Use. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 73(1). 11–18.2 indexed citations
13.
Inoue, Makoto, A. Noda, Yoshihisa Iwashita, & Toshiyuki Shirai. (1994). Conceptual Design of the 800 MeV Multi-purpose Proton Accelerator. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 72(1). 69–75.
Inoue, Makoto, Hideki Dewa, Yoshihisa Iwashita, et al.. (1993). Commissioning of the 7 MeV Proton Linac at ICR Kyoto University. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 71(1). 57–61.1 indexed citations
Shirai, Toshiyuki, Hideki Dewa, Yoshihisa Iwashita, et al.. (1993). Study of Beam Profile Monitor for the Proton Linac. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 71(1). 15–20.2 indexed citations
18.
Dewa, Hideki, Yoshihisa Iwashita, H. Okamoto, et al.. (1992). Design Study of a Beam Matching Section for the ICR Proton Linac. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 70(1). 89–98.2 indexed citations
Okamoto, H., et al.. (1987). Design of 433.3-MHz Proton RFQ Linac. Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University). 65(1). 35–45.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.