Magi Sque

1.8k total citations
57 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Magi Sque is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Magi Sque has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 32 papers in Clinical Psychology and 10 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Magi Sque's work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (33 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (29 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (28 papers). Magi Sque is often cited by papers focused on Organ Donation and Transplantation (33 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (29 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (28 papers). Magi Sque collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Magi Sque's co-authors include Tracy Long‐Sutehall, Sheila Payne, Julia Addington‐Hall, Wendy Walker, David Clark, George E. Dickinson, Andrew Broderick, Ioannis G. Vlachonikolis, Maggie Davies and Jill Macleod Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Transplantation.

In The Last Decade

Magi Sque

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Magi Sque United Kingdom 21 964 755 202 147 142 57 1.3k
Evert van Leeuwen Netherlands 25 908 0.9× 424 0.6× 472 2.3× 109 0.7× 70 0.5× 69 1.6k
Emma K. Massey Netherlands 25 857 0.9× 395 0.5× 178 0.9× 72 0.5× 261 1.8× 87 1.6k
Peter Saul Australia 13 393 0.4× 182 0.2× 248 1.2× 98 0.7× 29 0.2× 19 772
Márcia María Fontão Zago Brazil 17 450 0.5× 106 0.1× 285 1.4× 128 0.9× 159 1.1× 117 1.0k
Katherine Carroll Australia 20 267 0.3× 99 0.1× 405 2.0× 211 1.4× 55 0.4× 49 1.2k
Lisa Chamberlain United States 23 535 0.6× 357 0.5× 490 2.4× 279 1.9× 39 0.3× 90 1.7k
Sarah E. Connor United States 17 246 0.3× 93 0.1× 371 1.8× 181 1.2× 82 0.6× 50 1.1k
Michelle Y. Martin Romero United States 10 216 0.2× 139 0.2× 126 0.6× 283 1.9× 30 0.2× 26 578
Clarence Spigner United States 22 393 0.4× 348 0.5× 353 1.7× 301 2.0× 105 0.7× 58 1.3k
Annsofie Adolfsson Sweden 19 295 0.3× 397 0.5× 224 1.1× 204 1.4× 33 0.2× 70 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Magi Sque

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Magi Sque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Magi Sque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magi Sque more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Magi Sque

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Magi Sque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Magi Sque. The network helps show where Magi Sque may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Magi Sque

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Magi Sque. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Magi Sque based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Magi Sque. Magi Sque is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sque, Magi, et al.. (2018). Bereaved donor families' experiences of organ and tissue donation, and perceived influences on their decision making. Journal of Critical Care. 45. 82–89. 40 indexed citations
2.
Janes, Gillian, Laura Serrant, & Magi Sque. (2018). Screaming silences: lessons from the application of a new research framework. Nurse Researcher. 26(2). 32–36. 5 indexed citations
3.
Walker, Wendy & Magi Sque. (2015). Balancing hope and despair at the end of life: The contribution of organ and tissue donation. Journal of Critical Care. 32. 73–78. 39 indexed citations
4.
Walker, Wendy, Andrew Broderick, & Magi Sque. (2013). Factors Influencing Bereaved Families’ Decisions About Organ Donation. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 35(10). 1339–1359. 66 indexed citations
5.
Sque, Magi & Dariusz Galasiński. (2012). “Keeping Her Whole”. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 22(1). 55–63. 13 indexed citations
6.
Dougherty, Lisa, Magi Sque, & Robert Crouch. (2011). Decision‐making processes used by nurses during intravenous drug preparation and administration. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 68(6). 1302–1311. 25 indexed citations
7.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, et al.. (2011). Evaluation of the experiences of family members whose deceased relative donated tissues at the NHSBT dedicated donation facility in Speke, Liverpool. Cell and Tissue Banking. 13(4). 537–546. 8 indexed citations
8.
Bruzzone, Paolo, Magi Sque, Diana Giannarelli, Fabrizio Maria Frattaroli, & G Pappalardo. (2010). EXTENDED CRITERIA LIVER DONATION AND TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT CONSENT: THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE. Transplantation. 90. 766–766. 1 indexed citations
9.
Sque, Magi, et al.. (2008). Why relatives do not donate organs for transplants: ‘sacrifice’ or ‘gift of life’?. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 61(2). 134–144. 99 indexed citations
10.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, Magi Sque, & Julia Addington‐Hall. (2008). Conflict rationalisation: How family members cope with a diagnosis of brain stem death. Social Science & Medicine. 67(2). 253–261. 47 indexed citations
11.
Dickinson, George E., David Clark, & Magi Sque. (2007). Palliative care and end of life issues in UK pre-registration, undergraduate nursing programmes. Nurse Education Today. 28(2). 163–170. 83 indexed citations
12.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, Magi Sque, & Sheila Payne. (2006). Information Sharing: Its Impact on Donor and Nondonor Families' Experiences in the Hospital. Progress in Transplantation. 16(2). 144–149. 15 indexed citations
13.
Sque, Magi & Sheila Payne. (2006). Current issues in organ donation and transplantation. Mortality. 11(2). 111–116. 2 indexed citations
14.
Long‐Sutehall, Tracy, Magi Sque, & Sheila Payne. (2006). Information sharing: its impact on donor and nondonor families' experiences in the hospital. Progress in Transplantation. 16(2). 144–149. 4 indexed citations
15.
Sque, Magi, et al.. (2005). Organ Donation: Key Factors Influencing Families' Decision-Making. Transplantation Proceedings. 37(2). 543–546. 101 indexed citations
16.
Sque, Magi. (2004). Post bereavement correspondence between organ donor families, recipients, their OPOs and the National Donor Family Council - an American investigation. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 2 indexed citations
17.
Sque, Magi & Sheila Payne. (2003). Research notes. Nursing Standard. 17(34). 21–21. 1 indexed citations
18.
Sque, Magi, Sheila Payne, & Ioannis G. Vlachonikolis. (2000). Cadaveric donotransplantation: nurses’ attitudes, knowledge and behaviour. Social Science & Medicine. 50(4). 541–552. 56 indexed citations
19.
Sque, Magi. (2000). Researching the Bereaved: an investigator’s experience. Nursing Ethics. 7(1). 23–34. 39 indexed citations
20.
Sque, Magi & Sheila Payne. (1994). Gift Exchange Theory: a critique in relation to organ transplantation. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 19(1). 45–51. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026