Magi Sque

1.8k citations
57 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Magi Sque

55 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Magi Sque
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Clinical Psychology 755
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 964
  • Research and Theory 17
  • Transplantation 49
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 72
Replace Evert van Leeuwen with:
Evert van Leeuwen Netherlands
Emma K. Massey Netherlands
Katherine Carroll Australia
Owen Barr United Kingdom
Ewa Andersson Sweden
Denise Côté‐Arsenault United States
Lisa Chamberlain United States
Peter Saul Australia
Clarence Spigner United States
Daniel H. Grossoehme United States
Magi Sque relative to Evert van Leeuwen Netherlands Evert van Leeuwen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.7×
Evert van Leeuwen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Magi Sque

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Magi Sque's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Magi Sque with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Magi Sque more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Magi Sque

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Magi Sque. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Magi Sque. The network helps show where Magi Sque may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Magi Sque, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Magi Sque Line = papers co-authored together Magi Sque links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010221
2 2005101
3 200899
4 200783
5 199673
6 201366
7 200056
8 200847
9 200843
10 201840
11 200639
12 200039
13 201539
14 200236
15 201432
16 201628
17 199427
18 200427
19 201125
20 200825

About Magi Sque

Magi Sque is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Surgery, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Donation and Transplantation (33 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (29 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (28 papers), Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (8 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers), Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (3 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (3 papers) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (755 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (964 citations), Research and Theory (17 citations), Transplantation (49 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (72 citations). Magi Sque has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tracy Long‐Sutehall, Sheila Payne, Julia Addington‐Hall, Wendy Walker, George E. Dickinson, David Clark, Andrew Broderick, Ioannis G. Vlachonikolis, Maggie Davies and Jill Macleod Clark. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Ethics, Transplantation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Mortality and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact