Madeleine Pidcock

636 total citations
9 papers, 486 citations indexed

About

Madeleine Pidcock is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. According to data from OpenAlex, Madeleine Pidcock has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 486 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Recurrent topics in Madeleine Pidcock's work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (3 papers). Madeleine Pidcock is often cited by papers focused on Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (3 papers). Madeleine Pidcock collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Israel. Madeleine Pidcock's co-authors include Elinor McKone, Ashleigh Hall, Hugh Dennett, Mark Edwards, Bradley Duchaine, Amy Dawel, Galit Yovel, Romina Palermo, Chiara Fiorentini and Lulu Wan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Madeleine Pidcock

9 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Madeleine Pidcock Australia 6 462 229 222 54 44 9 486
Edwin Burns United Kingdom 13 399 0.9× 188 0.8× 152 0.7× 49 0.9× 57 1.3× 26 447
Sarah Cohan United States 9 550 1.2× 256 1.1× 277 1.2× 78 1.4× 53 1.2× 17 601
Rogelio J. Mercado United States 6 413 0.9× 210 0.9× 183 0.8× 36 0.7× 31 0.7× 10 451
Allan McNeill United Kingdom 7 442 1.0× 239 1.0× 246 1.1× 21 0.4× 94 2.1× 9 521
Thomas Grüter Germany 10 426 0.9× 239 1.0× 144 0.6× 45 0.8× 51 1.2× 11 476
Hugh Dennett Australia 6 380 0.8× 169 0.7× 184 0.8× 39 0.7× 32 0.7× 9 423
John Towler United Kingdom 14 606 1.3× 425 1.9× 224 1.0× 47 0.9× 61 1.4× 23 693
Martina Grüter Germany 8 378 0.8× 208 0.9× 127 0.6× 40 0.7× 50 1.1× 9 425
Anna K. Bobak United Kingdom 12 667 1.4× 257 1.1× 410 1.8× 74 1.4× 145 3.3× 18 703
Olivia S. Cheung United States 13 578 1.3× 274 1.2× 157 0.7× 14 0.3× 90 2.0× 30 645

Countries citing papers authored by Madeleine Pidcock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Madeleine Pidcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Madeleine Pidcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madeleine Pidcock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Madeleine Pidcock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Madeleine Pidcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Madeleine Pidcock. The network helps show where Madeleine Pidcock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Madeleine Pidcock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Madeleine Pidcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Madeleine Pidcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Madeleine Pidcock. Madeleine Pidcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Webb, Annabel, et al.. (2024). Clinician Perceptions of Family-Centered Care in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Settings. JAMA Network Open. 7(7). e2422104–e2422104. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pidcock, Madeleine, et al.. (2022). “The usual challenges of work are all magnified”: Australian paediatric health professionals’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11. 100434–100434. 1 indexed citations
3.
McKone, Elinor, Lulu Wan, Madeleine Pidcock, et al.. (2019). A critical period for faces: Other-race face recognition is improved by childhood but not adult social contact. Scientific Reports. 9(1). 12820–12820. 52 indexed citations
5.
Wan, Lulu, Kate Crookes, Amy Dawel, et al.. (2016). Face-blind for other-race faces: Individual differences in other-race recognition impairments.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 146(1). 102–122. 36 indexed citations
6.
McKone, Elinor, Jia Liu, Sarah Cohan, et al.. (2012). A Robust Method of Measuring Other-Race and Other-Ethnicity Effects: The Cambridge Face Memory Test Format. PLoS ONE. 7(10). e47956–e47956. 62 indexed citations
7.
McKone, Elinor, Ashleigh Hall, Madeleine Pidcock, et al.. (2011). Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test–Australian. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 28(2). 109–146. 101 indexed citations
8.
Dennett, Hugh, Elinor McKone, Ashleigh Hall, et al.. (2011). The Cambridge Car Memory Test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge Face Memory Test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behavior Research Methods. 44(2). 587–605. 168 indexed citations
9.
Susilo, Tirta, Elinor McKone, Hugh Dennett, et al.. (2010). Face recognition impairments despite normal holistic processing and face space coding: Evidence from a case of developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology. 27(8). 636–664. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026