Madeleine Pidcock
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Neurology
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Elinor McKoneAshleigh HallHugh DennettMark EdwardsBradley DuchaineGalit YovelAmy DawelRomina Palermo
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers)Face recognition and analysis (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Madeleine Pidcock
9 papers receiving 476 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Cognitive Neuroscience 462
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 229
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 222
- Neurology 54
- Social Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Madeleine Pidcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Madeleine Pidcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Madeleine Pidcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Madeleine Pidcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Madeleine Pidcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Madeleine Pidcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Madeleine Pidcock. The network helps show where Madeleine Pidcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Madeleine Pidcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Madeleine Pidcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Madeleine Pidcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Madeleine Pidcock. Madeleine Pidcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 101 | |
| 8 | 168 | |
| 9 | 63 |
About Madeleine Pidcock
Madeleine Pidcock is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 486 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (4 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (462 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (229 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (222 citations). Madeleine Pidcock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Elinor McKone, Ashleigh Hall, Hugh Dennett, Mark Edwards, Bradley Duchaine, Galit Yovel, Amy Dawel, Romina Palermo, Lulu Wan and Kate Crookes. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.