Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI
2009774 citationsBianca Zingales, Andrade Sg et al.Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruzprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of MA Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by MA Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites MA Miles more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by MA Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by MA Miles. The network helps show where MA Miles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of MA Miles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of MA Miles.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of MA Miles based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with MA Miles. MA Miles is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Zingales, Bianca, Andrade Sg, Marcelo R. S. Briones, et al.. (2009). A new consensus for Trypanosoma cruzi intraspecific nomenclature: second revision meeting recommends TcI to TcVI. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 104(7). 1051–1054.774 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Miles, MA, et al.. (2002). Genetic diversity among Paraguayan isolates of Leishmania braziliensis: Society Meeting at Manson House, London, 13 December 2001: Research in progress: short presentation [Poster Presentation]. LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).
3.
Miles, Godfrey P., et al.. (2002). Trypanosoma cruzi: multiclonality, genetic diversity, and experimental proof of genetic hybridization: Society Meeting at Manson House, London, 13 December 2001: Research in progress: short presentation [Poster Presentation]. LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).1 indexed citations
Miles, MA, et al.. (2001). First record of trypanosomes from the endemic Indian genus of Triatominae, Linshcosteus sp. nov.: Society Meeting at Manson House, London, 7 December 2000: Research in progress: short presentation. LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine).1 indexed citations
Miles, MA, Adelson Alcimar Almeida de Souza, & M. M. Póvoa. (1982). [The ecotopy of Panstrongylus megistus (Hemiptera, Reduviidae) in the Horto Forest (Rio de Janeiro)].. PubMed. 42(1). 31–5.8 indexed citations
14.
Schofield, CJ, Werner Apt, & MA Miles. (1982). The ecology of Chagas disease in Chile.. PubMed. 1(2-3). 117–29.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.