M. Steller

5.6k total citations
13 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

M. Steller is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering and Instrumentation. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Steller has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Aerospace Engineering and 3 papers in Instrumentation. Recurrent topics in M. Steller's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers). M. Steller is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (4 papers). M. Steller collaborates with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Italy. M. Steller's co-authors include J. Hasiba, H. Öttacher, A. K. Richter, Peter Hemmerich, T. Penz, K. Szegő, Н. В. Еркаев, I. Apáthy, М. И. Веригин and G. Micela and has published in prestigious journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Measurement Science and Technology and Planetary and Space Science.

In The Last Decade

M. Steller

9 papers receiving 222 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Steller Austria 6 217 31 20 20 18 13 235
César Fuentes United States 9 255 1.2× 14 0.5× 29 1.4× 31 1.6× 14 0.8× 19 283
J. Boldt United States 6 143 0.7× 41 1.3× 3 0.1× 15 0.8× 17 0.9× 22 173
Sarah A. Jaeggli United States 10 211 1.0× 40 1.3× 6 0.3× 11 0.6× 5 0.3× 30 227
M. Denby United Kingdom 8 177 0.8× 16 0.5× 13 0.7× 6 0.3× 12 0.7× 16 188
A. López Ariste France 6 296 1.4× 24 0.8× 29 1.4× 11 0.6× 6 0.3× 8 308
A. V. Panasyuk United States 10 393 1.8× 45 1.5× 13 0.7× 6 0.3× 7 0.4× 24 403
П. В. Кайгородов Russia 11 259 1.2× 6 0.2× 25 1.3× 20 1.0× 10 0.6× 32 281
G. A. Murphy United States 6 151 0.7× 31 1.0× 4 0.2× 20 1.0× 13 0.7× 17 169
S. Wannawichian Thailand 9 332 1.5× 184 5.9× 10 0.5× 32 1.6× 8 0.4× 20 343
Д. В. Бисикало Russia 9 213 1.0× 10 0.3× 10 0.5× 7 0.3× 11 0.6× 36 229

Countries citing papers authored by M. Steller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Steller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Steller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Steller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Steller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Steller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Steller. The network helps show where M. Steller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Steller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Steller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Steller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Steller. M. Steller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Cosentino, R., Mauro Focardi, Emanuele Galli, et al.. (2022). PLATO: the status of the instrument control unit following its critical design review. 47–47.
2.
Maksimović, M., J. Souček, S. D. Bale, et al.. (2020). The Radio and Plasma Waves (RPW) Instrument on Solar Orbiter : Capabilities, Performance and First results.. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).
3.
Ottensamer, R., A. Luntzer, F. Kerschbaum, et al.. (2020). A combined software and hardware data compression approach in PLATO. 51–51. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
6.
Bayer, J., S. Brandt, Olaf Hälker, et al.. (2016). WFI electronics and on-board data processing. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9905. 99052D–99052D. 6 indexed citations
7.
8.
Focardi, Mauro, S. Pezzuto, R. Cosentino, et al.. (2016). The instrument control unit of the ESA-PLATO 2.0 mission. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9904. 99042Y–99042Y. 4 indexed citations
9.
Nakamura, R., Ferdinand Plaschke, Lukas Giner, et al.. (2014). Interinstrument calibration using magnetic field data from the flux-gate magnetometer (FGM) and electron drift instrument (EDI) onboard Cluster. Geoscientific instrumentation, methods and data systems. 3(1). 1–11. 9 indexed citations
10.
Plaschke, Ferdinand, R. Nakamura, H. K. Leinweber, et al.. (2014). Flux-gate magnetometer spin axis offset calibration using the electron drift instrument. Measurement Science and Technology. 25(10). 105008–105008. 10 indexed citations
11.
Lammer, H., P. Odert, M. Leitzinger, et al.. (2009). Determining the mass loss limit for close-in exoplanets: what can we learn from transit observations?. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 506(1). 399–410. 98 indexed citations
12.
Kaufmann, E., G. Kargl, Norbert I. Kömle, et al.. (2009). Melting and Sublimation of Planetary Ices Under Low Pressure Conditions: Laboratory Experiments with a Melting Probe Prototype. Earth Moon and Planets. 105(1). 11–29. 20 indexed citations
13.
Веригин, М. И., N. M. Shutte, A. A. Galeev, et al.. (1991). Ions of planetary origin in the Martian magnetosphere (Phobos 2/TAUS experiment). Planetary and Space Science. 39(1-2). 131–137. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by César Fuentes Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Boldt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sarah A. Jaeggli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Denby Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. López Ariste Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. V. Panasyuk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by П. В. Кайгородов Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by G. A. Murphy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Wannawichian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Д. В. Бисикало
Rankless by CCL
2026