This map shows the geographic impact of M Schloegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Schloegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Schloegel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Schloegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Schloegel. The network helps show where M Schloegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Schloegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Schloegel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Schloegel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M Schloegel. M Schloegel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barsotti, Paola, et al.. (1995). [Cystic dystrophy on an aberrant duodenal pancreas. Apropos of a case].. PubMed. 132(12). 503–5.6 indexed citations
2.
Gaudias, J., et al.. (1995). [Blunt injuries of the spleen. What is the role of splenectomy?].. PubMed. 120(3). 165–70.2 indexed citations
3.
Schloegel, M, et al.. (1994). [Predictive factors of recurrence in surgically treated rectal villous tumors. Therapeutic approach based on 184 cases].. PubMed. 131(11). 466–72.1 indexed citations
4.
Adloff, M, et al.. (1993). [Local recurrence after surgery for cancer of the rectum].. PubMed. 47(7). 616–25.1 indexed citations
5.
Adloff, M, et al.. (1993). [Colorectal cancer in patients over the age of 80 years].. PubMed. 47(6). 492–6.11 indexed citations
Adloff, M, et al.. (1992). [Pancreatojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy after cephalic pancreatoduodenectomy].. PubMed. 118(1-2). 63–70.9 indexed citations
8.
Jehl, F., et al.. (1992). Evaluation of cefixime biliary disposition in the isolated perfused rabbit liver model and in humans.. PubMed. 18(8). 329–36.1 indexed citations
Adloff, M, et al.. (1991). [Role of pancreaticojejunostomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. A study of 105 operated patients].. PubMed. 117(4). 251–6; discussion 257.24 indexed citations
Adloff, M, et al.. (1990). [Superficial gastric cancer. Report of a series of 57 cases].. PubMed. 44(9). 713–7.1 indexed citations
13.
Adloff, M, et al.. (1990). [Colonic cancers. A retrospective study of 1122 surgically-treated patients].. PubMed. 127(12). 565–71.1 indexed citations
14.
Adloff, M, et al.. (1990). [Hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer. Should it be surgically treated? Report of 55 cases].. PubMed. 116(2). 144–9.2 indexed citations
Adloff, M, et al.. (1989). [Can the prognosis of patients treated surgically in cancer of the rectum or colon be improved by follow-up? Prospective study of 909 patients].. PubMed. 115(3). 228–36; discussion 236.14 indexed citations
17.
Arnaud, Jean, et al.. (1989). [Progress in evaluating lymphatic spread in cancer of rectum: endoscopic rectal lymphoscintigraphy].. PubMed. 126(3). 179–82.1 indexed citations
18.
Adloff, M, Jean‐Pierre Arnaud, M Schloegel, Dominique Thibaud, & Roberto Bergamaschi. (1986). Colorectal cancer in patients under 40 years of age. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 29(5). 322–325.87 indexed citations
Adloff, M, et al.. (1985). [Surgical drainage in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis. Apropos of 81 cases].. PubMed. 111(4). 371–7.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.