Countries citing papers authored by M. S. K. Choudhuri
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M. S. K. Choudhuri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. S. K. Choudhuri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. S. K. Choudhuri more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. S. K. Choudhuri
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. S. K. Choudhuri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. S. K. Choudhuri. The network helps show where M. S. K. Choudhuri may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. S. K. Choudhuri
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. S. K. Choudhuri.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. S. K. Choudhuri based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. S. K. Choudhuri. M. S. K. Choudhuri is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Das, Rajib, et al.. (2018). Hepatoprotective activity of Trichosanthes dioica Roxb. leaves against D-galactosamine induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7(6). 884–889.3 indexed citations
3.
Hasan, Md. Rakib, et al.. (2018). Evaluation of Pharmacological and Toxicological Studies of Ayurvedic Medicine Siddha Makardhwaja on Biological System of Male Sprague-Dawley Rats. 10(3). 1–4.3 indexed citations
4.
Uddin, Mohammad Jashim, et al.. (2017). TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES OF AN AYURVEDIC MEDICINE KANKAYANA GUTIKA. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(25). 44–50.1 indexed citations
5.
Choudhuri, M. S. K., et al.. (2017). PRECLINICAL LIPID PROFILE STUDIES OF A CLASSICAL AYURVEDIC PREPARATION MAKARADHWAJ RAS AFTER CHRONIC ADMINISTRATION TO MALE SPRAGUE-DAWLEY RATS. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(25). 65–70.2 indexed citations
6.
Choudhuri, M. S. K., et al.. (2017). TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES OF AN AYURVEDIC MEDICINE CHANDRANGSHU RAS. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(26). 41–46.1 indexed citations
7.
Choudhuri, M. S. K., et al.. (2017). ORGAN BODY WEIGHT RATIO TOXICITY STUDIES OF AN AYURVEDIC MEDICINE CHINTAMANICHATURMUKH RAS USED IN VERTIGO. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(26). 35–40.2 indexed citations
8.
Choudhuri, M. S. K., et al.. (2017). Toxicological evaluation of Guducyadi Louha, an ayurvedic formulation, on biochemical parameters of sprague-dawley rats. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(24). 17–22.1 indexed citations
9.
Hasan, Md. Rakib, et al.. (2017). Toxicological studies of an ayurvedic medicine Yogendra Ras used in epilepsy. International Journal of Pharmacy. 7(24). 31–37.1 indexed citations
10.
Hasan, Md. Rakib, et al.. (2015). TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES OF AN AYURVEDIC MEDICINE (BRIHOT CHANDRODOY MAKARDHWAJ) USED AS REJUVENATOR. International Journal of Pharmacy. 5(17). 759–764.1 indexed citations
11.
Sarker, Md. Moklesur Rahman, et al.. (2014). IN VITRO ASSESSMENT OF PRASARANI SANDHAN, A TRADITIONAL POLYHERBAL AYURVEDIC MEDICINE, FOR IMMUNOSTIMULATING ACTIVITY IN SPLENIC CELLS OF BALB/C MICE. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 6(9). 531–534.6 indexed citations
Hamid, Kaiser, et al.. (2010). Changes in lipid profile of rat plasma after chronic administration of Laghobanondo Rosh (LNR) - an ayurvedic formulation. 2010(3). 0–0.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.