M. R. Meredith

497 total citations
11 papers, 396 citations indexed

About

M. R. Meredith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. R. Meredith has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 396 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in M. R. Meredith's work include Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers). M. R. Meredith is often cited by papers focused on Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (5 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (4 papers) and Plant tissue culture and regeneration (4 papers). M. R. Meredith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. M. R. Meredith's co-authors include W. G. Morgan, Howard Thomas, John A. Harper, Hugh Thomas, I. P. King, J. M. Leggett, M. W. Humphreys, M. W. Humphreys, Marc M. Ghesquière and Z. Zwierzykowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Heredity and Euphytica.

In The Last Decade

M. R. Meredith

11 papers receiving 369 citations

Peers

M. R. Meredith

PS

EEBS

EC

ACS

MB

Christine Kubik United States

María Luz Zapiola United States

T. J. Jenkin United Kingdom

D. Singh India

O. J. Hunt United States

MJ Blumenthal Australia

Antonio Díaz‐Pérez Spain

Tilin Fang United States

A. Abdelguerfi Algeria

R. N. Peaden United States

Christine Kubik United States

M. R. Meredith

224 ×0.8

PS

159 ×0.8

EEBS

139 ×1.0

EC

64 ×0.8

ACS

47 ×0.7

MB

Citations per year, relative to M. R. Meredith M. R. Meredith (= 1×) peers Christine Kubik

Countries citing papers authored by M. R. Meredith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. R. Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. R. Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. R. Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. R. Meredith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. R. Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. R. Meredith. The network helps show where M. R. Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. R. Meredith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. R. Meredith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. R. Meredith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. R. Meredith. M. R. Meredith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Meredith, M. R., et al.. (2018). SH2B3 aberrations enriched in iAMP21 B lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer Genetics. 226-227. 30–35. 13 indexed citations

2.

Humphreys, M. W., Hugh Thomas, I. P. King, et al.. (1997). Applications of recent advances at the Institute of Grassland and Environmental research in cytogenetics of the Lolium/Festuca complex. Journal of Applied Genetics. 38(3). 273–284. 1 indexed citations

3.

Thomas, Hugh, W. G. Morgan, John A. Harper, M. R. Meredith, & I. P. King. (1997). Meiosis in Triploid Lolium. IV. Distribution of Chiasmata in Autotriploids.. CYTOLOGIA. 62(4). 383–387. 6 indexed citations

4.

Thomas, Howard, John A. Harper, M. R. Meredith, W. G. Morgan, & I. P. King. (1997). Physical mapping of ribosomal DNA sites in Festuca arundinacea and related species by in situ hybridization. Genome. 40(3). 406–410. 61 indexed citations

5.

Thomas, Hugh, John A. Harper, M. R. Meredith, et al.. (1996). Comparison of ribosomal DNA sites inLolium species by fluorescencein situ hybridization. Chromosome Research. 4(7). 486–490. 60 indexed citations

6.

Humphreys, M. W., Hugh Thomas, W. G. Morgan, et al.. (1995). Discriminating the ancestral progenitors of hexaploid Festuca arundinacea using genomic in situ hybridization. Heredity. 75(2). 171–174. 96 indexed citations

7.

Meredith, M. R., T.P.T. Michaelson-Yeates, Helen Ougham, & Hugh Thomas. (1995). Trifolium ambiguum as a source of variation in the breeding of white clover. Euphytica. 82(2). 185–191. 22 indexed citations

8.

Marshall, Alan, et al.. (1995). Reproductive characters of interspecific hybrids between Trifolium repens L. and T. nigrescens Viv.. Heredity. 74(2). 136–145. 24 indexed citations

9.

Leggett, J. M., Hugh Thomas, M. R. Meredith, et al.. (1994). Intergenomic translocations and the genomic composition of Avena maroccana Gdgr. revealed by FISH. Chromosome Research. 2(2). 163–164. 26 indexed citations

10.

Thomas, Howard, W. G. Morgan, M. R. Meredith, M. W. Humphreys, & J. M. Leggett. (1994). Identification of parental and recombined chromosomes in hybrid derivatives of Lolium multiflorum × Festuca pratensis by genomic in situ hybridization. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 88(8). 909–913. 86 indexed citations

11.

Morgan, W. G. & M. R. Meredith. (1983). A technique for identifying polyploid sectors in grass inflorescences. Euphytica. 32(1). 125–128. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact