M. Parker

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
27 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

M. Parker is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Parker has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Surgery, 10 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 7 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in M. Parker's work include Hip and Femur Fractures (15 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). M. Parker is often cited by papers focused on Hip and Femur Fractures (15 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (7 papers). M. Parker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. M. Parker's co-authors include G.A. Pryor, G.S. Keene, Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Alexander Siegmeth, Emil L. Smith, Riaz J.K. Khan, John R. Crawford, Helen HG Handoll, R. Griffiths and Adrian Boyle and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Chromatography A and Journal of Materials Science.

In The Last Decade

M. Parker

25 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures.

1993 683 citations G.S. Keene, M. Parker et al. BMJ profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Parker United Kingdom	14	1.1k	490	420	159	142	27	1.5k
Jens Peder Bagger Denmark	23	771 0.7×	849 1.7×	73 0.2×	123 0.8×	44 0.3×	73	1.7k
Mathias Wolfrum Switzerland	24	553 0.5×	785 1.6×	63 0.1×	117 0.7×	29 0.2×	87	1.7k
Sandeep Khosla United States	23	553 0.5×	732 1.5×	33 0.1×	81 0.5×	60 0.4×	96	1.4k
A Tabib France	17	197 0.2×	645 1.3×	149 0.4×	96 0.6×	63 0.4×	66	941
Hugh E. Stephenson United States	18	274 0.3×	137 0.3×	24 0.1×	48 0.3×	206 1.5×	46	1.4k
Manoj Chadha India	15	281 0.3×	65 0.1×	231 0.6×	59 0.4×	38 0.3×	40	796
Ruben N. van Veen Netherlands	19	993 0.9×	87 0.2×	137 0.3×	63 0.4×	241 1.7×	75	1.3k
Heinrich Koertke Germany	16	213 0.2×	573 1.2×	122 0.3×	298 1.9×	24 0.2×	38	1.4k
Ajay Gupta United States	17	143 0.1×	103 0.2×	152 0.4×	79 0.5×	14 0.1×	45	1.4k
Ali Massumi United States	21	498 0.5×	1.9k 3.8×	38 0.1×	138 0.9×	118 0.8×	85	2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Parker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Parker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Parker. The network helps show where M. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Parker. M. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Miller, Kerry A., et al.. (2018). A dominant-negative mutation in the BTB domain of KCTD15 in a family with frontal lipoma, congenital heart disease and cutis aplasia of the scalp defines a novel syndrome. European Journal of Human Genetics. 26. 233–234. 1 indexed citations

2.

Parker, M.. (2012). L-F5.3 Femoral neck collapse after internal fixation of intracapsular hip fractures. Injury. 43. S18–S18. 1 indexed citations

3.

Handoll, Helen HG, Catherine Sherrington, & M. Parker. (2007). Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults (update 2). 14 indexed citations

4.

Clifton, R., Shahnawaz Haleem, Alexis M. McKee, & M. Parker. (2007). Closed suction surgical wound drainage after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. International Orthopaedics. 32(6). 723–727. 30 indexed citations

5.

Wynn-Jones, Henry, et al.. (2006). Is Perioperative Blood Transfusion a Risk Factor for Mortality or Infection After Hip Fracture?. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 20(10). 675–679. 68 indexed citations

6.

Parker, M., Helen HG Handoll, & R. Griffiths. (2004). Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults (Review). 72 indexed citations

7.

Parker, M., Riaz J.K. Khan, John R. Crawford, & G.A. Pryor. (2002). Hemiarthroplasty <I>versus</I> internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly: A randomised trial of 455 patients. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. 84(8). 1150–1155. 152 indexed citations

8.

Pervez, Humayon, et al.. (2002). EXPERIENCE WITH THE LONG GAMMA NAIL IN PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES. 169–169. 1 indexed citations

9.

Parker, M.. (2001). Current concepts in the treatment of hip fracture. Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie. 34(1). 74–77. 8 indexed citations

10.

Parker, M.. (2000). Evidence based case report Managing an elderly patient with a fractured femur. BMJ. 320(7227). 102–103. 16 indexed citations

11.

Parker, M., et al.. (1997). The use of a hip score in assessing the results of treatment of proximal femoral fractures. International Orthopaedics. 21(4). 262–264. 9 indexed citations

12.

Dingle, J. T. & M. Parker. (1997). NSAID Stimulation of Human Cartilage Matrix Synthesis. Clinical Drug Investigation. 14(5). 353–362. 14 indexed citations

13.

Hamerton, Ian, et al.. (1996). Development and application of radio-size-exclusion chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A. 727(1). 61–70. 3 indexed citations

14.

Janes, Robert R., et al.. (1994). An EPR study of Cu2+ substitution in La2NiO4. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 136(1-2). L13–L17. 1 indexed citations

15.

Keene, G.S., M. Parker, & G.A. Pryor. (1993). Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures.. BMJ. 307(6914). 1248–1250. 683 indexed citations breakdown →

16.

Parker, M., et al.. (1992). A comparison of presenting characteristics of patients with intracapsular and extracapsular proximal femoral fractures.. PubMed. 85(3). 152–5. 34 indexed citations

17.

Parker, M.. (1992). Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures in the elderly?. Injury. 23(8). 521–524. 35 indexed citations

18.

Parker, M.. (1970). Ideals in Abelian Group-Rings. Journal of the London Mathematical Society. s2-2(2). 361–365. 2 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Emil L., et al.. (1958). KINETICS OF PAPAIN ACTION. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 230(1). 283–293. 23 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Emil L. & M. Parker. (1958). Kinetics of Papain Action. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 233(6). 1387–1391. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact