Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Differential Staining of Aborted and Nonaborted Pollen
19691.4k citationsM. P. AlexanderStain Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by M. P. Alexander
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of M. P. Alexander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. P. Alexander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. P. Alexander more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. P. Alexander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. P. Alexander. The network helps show where M. P. Alexander may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. P. Alexander
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. P. Alexander.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. P. Alexander based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. P. Alexander. M. P. Alexander is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Alexander, M. P., et al.. (1996). Bluetongue - its impact on international trade in meat and livestock. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 66(66). 254–258.11 indexed citations
Alexander, M. P., et al.. (1995). Electromagnetic field, a novel tool to increase germination and seedling vigour of conserved onion (Allium cepa L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.) seeds with low viability. 104. 1–5.61 indexed citations
5.
Alexander, M. P. & S. Ganeshan. (1990). Electromagnetic field-induced in vitro pollen germination and tube growth.. Current Science. 59(5). 276–277.8 indexed citations
6.
Alexander, M. P. & P. E. Rajasekharan. (1990). Magnetic stimulus: a novel tool to promote papaya pollen germination. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 3(2). 9–12.1 indexed citations
7.
Alexander, M. P. & S. Ganeshan. (1989). Preserving Viability and Fertility of Tomato and Egg Plant Pollen in Liquid Nitrogen. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources. 2(2). 140–144.2 indexed citations
Ganeshan, S. & M. P. Alexander. (1987). Storage and longevity of papaya (Carica papaya L. 'Washington') pollen, pt. 2: Effect of freeze-drying and storage at 20 degrees C on pollen fertility.1 indexed citations
Alexander, M. P.. (1969). Differential Staining of Aborted and Nonaborted Pollen. Stain Technology. 44(3). 117–122.1403 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Alexander, M. P.. (1968). Spindle abnormalities in Saccharum. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The). 28(3). 359–364.2 indexed citations
17.
Alexander, M. P.. (1963). Investigations on the microgametophyte lethal-simulating x locus in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. and L. pimpinellifolium Mill /. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.