M. Opher

5.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
129 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

M. Opher is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Opher has authored 129 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 121 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 13 papers in Molecular Biology and 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. Opher's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (111 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (84 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (74 papers). M. Opher is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (111 papers), Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics (84 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (74 papers). M. Opher collaborates with scholars based in United States, Greece and Russia. M. Opher's co-authors include T. I. Gombosi, G. Tóth, J. F. Drake, M. Swisdak, W. B. Manchester, J. D. Richardson, И. В. Соколов, Darren L. De Zeeuw, E. C. Stone and J. M. Dawson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Physical Review Letters.

In The Last Decade

M. Opher

111 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

Adaptive numerical algorithms in space weather modeling 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Opher United States 28 3.0k 471 397 314 181 129 3.2k
C. S. Salem United States 24 2.3k 0.7× 602 1.3× 241 0.6× 316 1.0× 152 0.8× 67 2.3k
P. Trávnı́ček Czechia 34 3.4k 1.1× 825 1.8× 234 0.6× 635 2.0× 209 1.2× 112 3.7k
Petr Hellinger Czechia 36 3.2k 1.1× 748 1.6× 189 0.5× 726 2.3× 159 0.9× 106 3.4k
K. Goetz United States 33 3.7k 1.2× 718 1.5× 468 1.2× 433 1.4× 138 0.8× 108 3.9k
Tohru Hada Japan 23 1.5k 0.5× 377 0.8× 356 0.9× 534 1.7× 75 0.4× 117 2.1k
U. Motschmann Germany 38 4.0k 1.3× 1.3k 2.8× 200 0.5× 242 0.8× 224 1.2× 198 4.3k
W. A. Coles United States 36 2.7k 0.9× 273 0.6× 281 0.7× 425 1.4× 115 0.6× 106 2.9k
A. Mangeney France 28 2.8k 0.9× 884 1.9× 360 0.9× 801 2.6× 97 0.5× 80 3.1k
F. Valentini Italy 27 1.7k 0.6× 351 0.7× 417 1.1× 624 2.0× 79 0.4× 94 2.0k
Zdeněk Němeček Czechia 34 3.6k 1.2× 1.6k 3.3× 292 0.7× 131 0.4× 194 1.1× 279 3.8k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Opher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Opher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Opher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Opher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Opher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Opher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Opher. The network helps show where M. Opher may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Opher

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Opher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Opher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Opher. M. Opher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Giacalone, J., M. Opher, M. Gkioulidou, et al.. (2025). Hybrid Simulations of Interstellar Pickup Ions at the Solar Wind Termination Shock Revisited. The Astrophysical Journal. 980(1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations
2.
Opher, M., et al.. (2025). Exploring the Complex Heliotail Boundary by an Extended Level Set Approach. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 980(2). L19–L19.
3.
Opher, M., et al.. (2025). The Coupling and Evolution of Kelvin–Helmholtz and Rayleigh–Taylor Instabilities in the Heliosheath. The Astrophysical Journal. 988(2). 248–248.
4.
Opher, M., Abraham Loeb, Catherine Zucker, et al.. (2024). The Passage of the Solar System through the Edge of the Local Bubble. The Astrophysical Journal. 972(2). 201–201. 3 indexed citations
5.
Opher, M., et al.. (2024). Complementary interstellar detections from the heliotail. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences. 10.
6.
Opher, M., et al.. (2024). Instabilities along the Axis of the Heliospheric Jets. The Astrophysical Journal. 978(1). 57–57. 3 indexed citations
7.
Adhikari, L., G. P. Zank, Lingling Zhao, et al.. (2023). Theory and Transport of Nearly Incompressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence: High Plasma Beta Regime. The Astrophysical Journal. 953(1). 44–44. 11 indexed citations
8.
Collinson, G., Heli Hietala, Ferdinand Plaschke, et al.. (2023). Shocklets and Short Large Amplitude Magnetic Structures (SLAMS) in the High Mach Foreshock of Venus. Geophysical Research Letters. 50(18). 3 indexed citations
9.
Sokół, J. M., H. Kucharek, H. J. Fahr, et al.. (2022). Interstellar Neutrals, Pickup Ions, and Energetic Neutral Atoms Throughout the Heliosphere: Present Theory and Modeling Overview. Space Science Reviews. 218(3). 18 indexed citations
10.
Opher, M., J. F. Drake, G. P. Zank, et al.. (2021). A Turbulent Heliosheath Driven by the Rayleigh–Taylor Instability. The Astrophysical Journal. 922(2). 181–181. 26 indexed citations
11.
Fuselier, S. A., André Galli, J. D. Richardson, et al.. (2021). Energetic Neutral Atom Fluxes from the Heliosheath: Constraints from in situ Measurements and Models. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 915(2). L26–L26. 12 indexed citations
12.
Moore, Luke, James O’Donoghue, Henrik Melin, et al.. (2017). Variability of Jupiter's IR H3+ aurorae during Juno approach. Geophysical Research Letters. 44(10). 4513–4522. 19 indexed citations
13.
Opher, M., J. F. Drake, M. Swisdak, B. Zieger, & G. Tóth. (2017). The Twist of the Draped Interstellar Magnetic Field Ahead of the Heliopause: A Magnetic Reconnection Driven Rotational Discontinuity. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 839(1). L12–L12. 23 indexed citations
14.
Drake, J. F., M. Swisdak, & M. Opher. (2015). A MODEL OF THE HELIOSPHERE WITH JETS. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 808(2). L44–L44. 44 indexed citations
15.
Zieger, B., G. Tóth, M. Opher, & T. I. Gombosi. (2015). Solar Wind Prediction at Pluto During the New Horizons Flyby: Results From a Two-Dimensional Multi-fluid MHD Model of the Outer Heliosphere. 2015 AGU Fall Meeting. 2015. 2 indexed citations
16.
Provornikova, Elena, M. Opher, V. Izmodenov, & G. Tóth. (2013). Propagation into the heliosheath of a large-scale solar wind disturbance bounded by a pair of shocks. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 4 indexed citations
17.
Vidotto, A. A., M. Jardine, J. Morin, et al.. (2013). M-dwarf stellar winds: the effects of realistic magnetic geometry on rotational evolution and planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 438(2). 1162–1175. 95 indexed citations
18.
Opher, M., et al.. (2010). Evolution of Piled Up Compressions in Modeled CME Sheaths and the Resulting Sheath Structures. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010. 1 indexed citations
19.
Manchester, W. B., I. I. Roussev, M. Opher, et al.. (2002). 3D MHD Simulations of Flux Rope Driven CMEs. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2002. 1 indexed citations
20.
Manchester, W. B., I. I. Roussev, M. Opher, et al.. (2002). 3D MHD Simulation of CME Propagation from Solar Corona to 1 AU. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026