M. N. Shapiro

417 total citations
25 papers, 288 citations indexed

About

M. N. Shapiro is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, M. N. Shapiro has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 288 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Geophysics, 15 papers in Geology and 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in M. N. Shapiro's work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (19 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers). M. N. Shapiro is often cited by papers focused on Geological and Geochemical Analysis (19 papers), Geological Studies and Exploration (14 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (8 papers). M. N. Shapiro collaborates with scholars based in Russia, United States and France. M. N. Shapiro's co-authors include Mikhail L. Bazhenov, Natalia M. Levashova, John I. Garver, A. V. Soloviev, В. С. Буртман, M. T. Brandon, J. K. Hourigan, D. M. Pechersky, E. A. Shcherbinina and I. R. Kravchenko‐Berezhnoy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Earth and Planetary Science Letters and Tectonophysics.

In The Last Decade

M. N. Shapiro

23 papers receiving 266 citations

Peers

M. N. Shapiro

GEOPH

GEOLO

C. Mallows United Kingdom

Е. Х. Турутанов Russia

David Hindle Germany

E. J. Moll-Stalcup United States

Luis Alberto Delgado-Argote Mexico

N. Okaya China

C Lowe Canada

E. Hafkenscheid Netherlands

R. V. Kanda United States

M. V. Kononov Russia

C. Mallows United Kingdom

M. N. Shapiro

291 ×1.2

GEOPH

42 ×0.4

GEOLO

32 ×0.4

18 ×0.6

52 ×2.1

Citations per year, relative to M. N. Shapiro M. N. Shapiro (= 1×) peers C. Mallows

Countries citing papers authored by M. N. Shapiro

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. N. Shapiro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. N. Shapiro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. N. Shapiro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. N. Shapiro

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. N. Shapiro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. N. Shapiro. The network helps show where M. N. Shapiro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. N. Shapiro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. N. Shapiro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. N. Shapiro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. N. Shapiro. M. N. Shapiro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Soloviev, A. V., John I. Garver, M. N. Shapiro, M. T. Brandon, & J. K. Hourigan. (2011). Eocene arc-continent collision in northern Kamchatka, Russian Far East. Rossijskij žurnal nauk o zemle/Russian journal of earth sciences. 12(1). 1–13. 4 indexed citations

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2009). Formation of the Olyutorsky–Kamchatka foldbelt: a kinematic model. Russian Geology and Geophysics. 50(8). 668–681. 35 indexed citations

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2008). Lateral structural variability in zone of eocene island-arc-continent collision, Kamchatka. Geotectonics. 42(6). 469–487. 15 indexed citations

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2007). New data on the Baraba Formation age (the Sredinnyi Range of Kamchatka). Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 15(1). 112–119. 3 indexed citations

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2006). Ophiolites of the Kamchatsky Mys Peninsula, eastern Kamchatka: Structure, composition, and geodynamic setting. Geotectonics. 40(4). 297–320. 21 indexed citations

Soloviev, A. V., et al.. (2006). Mesozoic syncollision siliciclastic sediments of the Bols’shoi Lyakhov Island (New Siberian Islands). Stratigraphy and Geological Correlation. 14(1). 30–48. 28 indexed citations

Garver, John I., et al.. (2004). Provenance and tectonic settings of accretionary wedge sediments on northeastern Karaginski Island (Kamchatka, Russian Far East). Rossijskij žurnal nauk o zemle/Russian journal of earth sciences. 6(2). 105–132. 5 indexed citations

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2002). Lesnaya Nappe, Northern Kamchatka. 13 indexed citations

Soloviev, A. V., M. N. Shapiro, John I. Garver, E. A. Shcherbinina, & I. R. Kravchenko‐Berezhnoy. (2002). New age data from the Lesnaya Group: A key to understanding the timing of arc‐continent collision, Kamchatka, Russia. Island Arc. 11(1). 79–90. 13 indexed citations

10.

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (2001). Sources of Zircons from Cretaceous and Lower Paleogene Terrigenous Sequences of the Southern Koryak Upland and Western Kamchatka. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 36(4). 322–336. 12 indexed citations

11.

Levashova, Natalia M., et al.. (2000). Paleomagnetism and geochronology of the Late Cretaceous‐Paleogene island arc complex of the Kronotsky Peninsula, Kamchatka, Russia: Kinematic implications. Tectonics. 19(5). 834–851. 22 indexed citations

12.

Brandon, M. T., et al.. (1998). COLLISION OF THE OLYUTOR ISLAND ARC WITH THE EURASIAN CONTINENTAL MARGIN :KINEMATIC AND AGE ASPECTS. Doklady Earth Sciences. 361(5). 632–634. 9 indexed citations

13.

Levashova, Natalia M., M. N. Shapiro, & Mikhail L. Bazhenov. (1998). Late Cretaceous paleomagnetic data from the Median Range of Kamchatka, Russia: tectonic implications. Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 163(1-4). 235–246. 16 indexed citations

14.

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (1997). Composition and Genesis of Clastic Material in Psammitic Rocks of the Paleocene–Eocene Stolbov Group, Kamchatskii Mys Peninsula, Eastern Kamchatka. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 32(5). 451–462. 2 indexed citations

15.

Pechersky, D. M., et al.. (1997). Palaeomagnetic study of the Eastern Kamchatka Cretaceous-Palaeocene island arc: new evidence concerning palaeosubduction zone absolute motion. Geophysical Journal International. 130(3). 606–622. 2 indexed citations

16.

Pechersky, D. M., et al.. (1997). Palaeomagnetism of Palaeogene volcanic series of the KamchatskyMys Peninsula, East Kamchatka: the motion of an active island arc. Tectonophysics. 273(3-4). 219–237. 22 indexed citations

17.

Levashova, Natalia M., Mikhail L. Bazhenov, & M. N. Shapiro. (1997). Late Cretaceous paleomagnetism of the East Ranges island arc complex, Kamchatka: Implications for terrane movements and kinematics of the northwest Pacific. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 102(B11). 24843–24857. 19 indexed citations

18.

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (1996). Upper Cretaceous Sandstones from the Kamchatka Cape, Eastern Kamchatka: New Data on Products of Continental Crust Erosion. Lithology and Mineral Resources. 31(3). 267–278. 1 indexed citations

19.

Beloussov, V. V., et al.. (1979). Intercontinental structural ties and mobilistic reconstructions. International Journal of Earth Sciences. 68(1). 393–427. 2 indexed citations

20.

Shapiro, M. N., et al.. (1977). The Paleogene in the southern part of Karagin Island (Eastern Kamchatka). International Geology Review. 19(3). 349–357.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact