M. Miceli

2.5k total citations
95 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

M. Miceli is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Miceli has authored 95 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 89 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 70 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 4 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in M. Miceli's work include Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (71 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (67 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (45 papers). M. Miceli is often cited by papers focused on Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (71 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (67 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (45 papers). M. Miceli collaborates with scholars based in Italy, France and Japan. M. Miceli's co-authors include F. Bocchino, S. Orlando, G. Pérès, F. Reale, M. L. Pumo, O. Petruk, E. Troja, M. Ono, A. Decourchelle and R. Bonito and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

M. Miceli

85 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Miceli Italy 19 1.1k 812 27 23 17 95 1.1k
M. F. Bietenholz Canada 19 796 0.7× 476 0.6× 22 0.8× 28 1.2× 20 1.2× 66 848
J. Niemiec Poland 19 731 0.7× 676 0.8× 30 1.1× 6 0.3× 22 1.3× 51 826
Parviz Ghavamian United States 26 1.5k 1.4× 1.2k 1.5× 23 0.9× 21 0.9× 11 0.6× 60 1.6k
В. С. Имшенник Russia 13 452 0.4× 369 0.5× 36 1.3× 18 0.8× 9 0.5× 91 605
G. Madejski United States 17 737 0.7× 558 0.7× 20 0.7× 9 0.4× 25 1.5× 42 797
E. Fenimore United States 13 532 0.5× 120 0.1× 25 0.9× 17 0.7× 29 1.7× 137 587
C. von Montigny United States 18 816 0.7× 808 1.0× 23 0.9× 9 0.4× 6 0.4× 58 927
R. Ojha United States 8 396 0.4× 400 0.5× 20 0.7× 9 0.4× 16 0.9× 22 475
D. Khangulyan Japan 21 1.2k 1.1× 952 1.2× 67 2.5× 16 0.7× 11 0.6× 54 1.3k
G. Richardson United States 7 494 0.5× 331 0.4× 18 0.7× 17 0.7× 17 1.0× 23 580

Countries citing papers authored by M. Miceli

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Miceli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Miceli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Miceli more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Miceli

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Miceli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Miceli. The network helps show where M. Miceli may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Miceli

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Miceli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Miceli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Miceli. M. Miceli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Orlando, S., Hans‐Thomas Janka, A. Wongwathanarat, et al.. (2025). Filamentary ejecta network in Cassiopeia A reveals fingerprints of the supernova explosion mechanism. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 696. A108–A108. 5 indexed citations
3.
Sun, Lei, S. Orlando, M. Miceli, et al.. (2025). Evolution of X-Ray Gas in SN 1987A from 2007 to 2021: Ring Fading and Ejecta Brightening Unveiled through Differential Emission Measure Analysis. The Astrophysical Journal. 981(1). 26–26. 3 indexed citations
4.
Lemoine-Goumard, M., et al.. (2024). Hadronic particle acceleration in the supernova remnant SN 1006 as traced by Fermi-LAT observations. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 693. A193–A193.
5.
Miceli, M., Aya Bamba, S. Orlando, et al.. (2024). Probing Shocked Ejecta in SN 1987A: A Novel Diagnostic Approach Using XRISM-Resolve. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 961(1). L9–L9. 6 indexed citations
6.
Miceli, M., O. Petruk, Aya Bamba, et al.. (2024). Time Evolution of the Synchrotron X-Ray Emission in Kepler’s Supernova Remnant: The Effects of Turbulence and Shock Velocity. The Astrophysical Journal. 973(2). 105–105. 1 indexed citations
7.
Miceli, M., S. Orlando, Barbara Olmi, et al.. (2022). Additional Evidence for a Pulsar Wind Nebula in the Heart of SN 1987A from Multiepoch X-Ray Data and MHD Modeling. The Astrophysical Journal. 931(2). 132–132. 15 indexed citations
8.
Miceli, M., Aya Bamba, Satoru Katsuda, et al.. (2022). A Spatially Resolved Study of Hard X-Ray Emission in Kepler’s Supernova Remnant: Indications of Different Regimes of Particle Acceleration. The Astrophysical Journal. 935(2). 152–152. 7 indexed citations
9.
Miceli, M., G. Pérès, F. Bocchino, et al.. (2021). X-ray emitting structures in the Vela SNR: ejecta anisotropies and progenitor stellar wind residuals. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 8 indexed citations
10.
Li, Jiangtao, J. Ballet, M. Miceli, et al.. (2018). Spatially Resolved Broadband Synchrotron Emission from the Nonthermal Limbs of SN1006. The Astrophysical Journal. 864(1). 85–85. 13 indexed citations
11.
Miceli, M. & Aya Bamba. (2018). Detection of X-ray flares from\nAX J1714.1−3912,\nthe unidentified source near\nRX J1713.7−3946. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
12.
Argiroffi, C., J. J. Drake, R. Bonito, et al.. (2017). Redshifted X-rays from the material accreting onto TW Hydrae: Evidence of a low-latitude accretion spot. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 11 indexed citations
13.
Petruk, O., S. Orlando, M. Miceli, & F. Bocchino. (2017). Linking gamma-ray spectra of supernova remnants to the cosmic ray injection properties in the aftermath of supernovae. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
14.
López‐Santiago, J., et al.. (2016). Modeling nonthermal emission from stellar bow shocks (Research Note). LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 4 indexed citations
15.
Combi, J. A., et al.. (2015). An X-ray characterization of the central region of the supernova remnant G332.5-5.6. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 1 indexed citations
16.
Miceli, M., F. Reale, S. Gburek, et al.. (2012). X-ray emitting hot plasma in solar active regions observed by the SphinX spectrometer. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 18 indexed citations
17.
Bocchino, F., S. Orlando, M. Miceli, & O. Petruk. (2011). Constraints on the local interstellar magnetic field from non-thermal emission of SN1006. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 31 indexed citations
18.
Miceli, M., F. Bocchino, Dmytro Iakubovskyi, et al.. (2009). Thermal emission, shock modification, and X-ray emitting ejecta in SN 1006. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 38 indexed citations
19.
Bocchino, F., M. Miceli, & E. Troja. (2009). On the metal abundances inside mixed-morphology supernova remnants: the case of IC 443  and G166.0+4.3. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 18 indexed citations
20.
Petruk, O., F. Bocchino, G. Castelletti, et al.. (2008). X-ray emission of the shock of SN1006. Constraints on electron kinetics. 109. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026