This map shows the geographic impact of M. Lamont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Lamont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Lamont more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Lamont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Lamont. The network helps show where M. Lamont may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Lamont
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Lamont.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Lamont based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Lamont. M. Lamont is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jowett, J. M., R. Alemany–Fernández, P. Baudrenghien, et al.. (2013). PROTON-NUCLEUS COLLISIONS IN THE LHC. CERN Bulletin.5 indexed citations
5.
Lamont, M.. (2013). The First Years of LHC Operation for Luminosity Production. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
6.
Alemany–Fernández, R., Giulia Papotti, J. Wenninger, et al.. (2012). Operation of the LHC at High Luminosity and High Stored Energy. Presented at. 3767–3769.3 indexed citations
7.
Aßmann, R., Markus Zerlauth, A. Siemko, et al.. (2012). First operational experience with the LHC machine protection system when operating with beam energies beyond the 100MJ range. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 4062–4064.2 indexed citations
8.
Lamont, M., et al.. (2012). EXPECTED AND MEASURED BEHAVIOUR OF THE TUNE IN THE LHC OPERATION AT 3 . 5 TEV. OAR@UM (University of Malta).2 indexed citations
9.
Todesco, E., Lucio Fiscarelli, M. Giovannozzi, et al.. (2012). The Magnetic Field Model of the Large Hadron Collider: Overview of Operation at 3.5 and 4 TeV. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).3 indexed citations
Pereira, M. Alves Gallo, et al.. (2011). FEED-FORWARD IN THE LHC. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).
12.
Buffat, Xavier, M. Lamont, Stefano Redaelli, & J. Wenninger. (2011). BEAM BASED OPTIMIZATION OF THE SQUEEZE AT THE LHC. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).2 indexed citations
13.
Jowett, J. M., G. Arduini, M. Lamont, et al.. (2011). First run of the LHC as a heavy-ion collider. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1837–1839.3 indexed citations
14.
Bartmann, Wolfgang, Chiara Bracco, M. Meddahi, et al.. (2010). Injection into LHC of single bunches with nominal intensity. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).1 indexed citations
15.
Fartoukh, S., M. Giovannozzi, R. Calaga, et al.. (2009). Linear & Nonl. optics checks diring LHC injection tests.
Arduini, G., R. Aßmann, R. Bailey, et al.. (2002). Electron-positron collisions at 209 GeV in LEP. PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268). 1. 356–358.2 indexed citations
19.
Lamont, M.. (2002). Twelve years of LEP. PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268). 5. 3499–3501.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.