Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Single-Drug Therapy for Hypertension in Men -- A Comparison of Six Antihypertensive Agents with Placebo
1993900 citationsBarry J. Materson, William C. Cushman et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M Lakshman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Lakshman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Lakshman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Lakshman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Lakshman. The network helps show where M Lakshman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Lakshman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Lakshman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Lakshman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M Lakshman. M Lakshman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2020). Study of Cadmium and Chlorpyrifos Induced Changes in Protein and Lipid Profile in Rats. Toxicology International. 27. 54–57.1 indexed citations
3.
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2020). Occurrence of foreign body induced ruminal impaction in ruminants-gross findings of necropsy. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 8(1). 177–181.1 indexed citations
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2019). Occurrence of certain tumours in Bovines. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 7(3). 495–497.1 indexed citations
6.
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2018). Histopathological changes in bone marrow induced by lead and cadmium alone and combined exposure in male Wistar rats. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 6(2). 3035–3037.1 indexed citations
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2015). Histological and ultrastructural changes induced by long term feeding of imidacloprid and amelioration with vitamin C and Withania somnifera in layer birds. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 39(4). 343–346.
10.
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2013). Imidacloprid–Induced Nephrotoxicity in Male Rats. International journal of scientific research.2 indexed citations
11.
Sirisha, P., et al.. (2008). Haematobiochemical changes in Jatropha deoiled seed cake (Jatropha curcas) induced toxicity in broiler chicken and their amelioration.. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 32(1). 47–51.4 indexed citations
Lakshman, M, et al.. (2006). Pathology of lung affections in poultry - A field study. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 30(1). 42–45.1 indexed citations
Ghosh, P.K., et al.. (1991). Effect of chronic ethanol on hepatic apolipoprotein (Apo)E glycosylation.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.