M L Applebury
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Materials Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang BaehrP. M. RentzepisMichelle DevlinK. S. PETERSJeff ColemanRichard SwansonEishin MoritaFarhang Farhangfar
- Topics
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (14 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers)Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenRussia
In The Last Decade
M L Applebury
27 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Molecular Biology 2.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.4k
- Cell Biology 278
- Ophthalmology 228
- Materials Chemistry 190
Countries citing papers authored by M L Applebury
This map shows the geographic impact of M L Applebury's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M L Applebury with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M L Applebury more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M L Applebury
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M L Applebury. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M L Applebury. The network helps show where M L Applebury may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M L Applebury
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M L Applebury. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M L Applebury based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M L Applebury. M L Applebury is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 72 | |
| 2 | 456 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 164 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 106 | |
| 7 | 86 | |
| 8 | The molecular mechanism of photoreception : report of the Dahlem Workshop on the Molecular Mechanism of Photoreception, Berlin, 1984 November 25-30 | 3 |
| 9 | 50 | |
| 10 | 134 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 232 | |
| 15 | 95 | |
| 16 | 37 | |
| 17 | 157 | |
| 18 | 171 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 131 |
About M L Applebury
M L Applebury is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Cell Biology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (14 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (7 papers) and Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Molecular Biology (2.1k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (171 citations). M L Applebury has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Baehr, P. M. Rentzepis, Michelle Devlin, K. S. PETERS, Jeff Coleman, Richard Swanson, Eishin Morita, Farhang Farhangfar, Jon Robbins and Karen Kage. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.