Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Kumar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Kumar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Kumar more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Kumar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Kumar. The network helps show where M. Kumar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Kumar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Kumar.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Kumar based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Kumar. M. Kumar is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2016). Leader-Member Exchange as a Predictor of Employee Turnover. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Sathya, B., et al.. (2014). A PRIMITIVE APPROACH ON REVIEW OF SIDDHA HERBS, HERBO-MINERAL FORMULATION EXHIBITING ANTIVIRAL ACTIVITY. International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences.4 indexed citations
10.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2014). Medicolegal significance of postmortem lividity in determination of time since death. Journal of Forensic Medicine. 31(1). 12–17.1 indexed citations
Kumar, M., et al.. (2013). THERAPEUTIC EFFICACY AND NUTRITIONAL POTENTIALITY OF INDIAN BAY LEAF (CINNAMOMUM TAMALA BUCH. - HEM.). International Journal of Pharmacy. 3(10). 779–785.6 indexed citations
13.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2013). Anti-typhoid Activity of Adhatoda vasica and Vitex negundo. 2(3). 64–75.12 indexed citations
14.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2012). Revitalising Management Education in India: A Strategic Approach. 3(2). 5.3 indexed citations
15.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2012). Revitalising Management Education in India: A Strategic Approach. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
16.
Sharma, Anil Kumar, et al.. (2011). Immunosuppressive effect of combined citrinin and endosulfan toxicity in pregnant Wistar rats.. Veterinarski arhiv. 81(6). 751–763.13 indexed citations
17.
Sharma, Arvind, et al.. (2009). Fumonisin B1 and ochratoxin A induced biochemical changes in young male New Zealand White rabbits. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 33(1). 30–34.3 indexed citations
18.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2007). Ochratoxin A and citrinin induced biochemical changes in New Zealand White rabbits. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 31(2). 135–139.4 indexed citations
19.
Kumar, M., et al.. (2007). Haematological changes induced by ochratoxin A and citrinin alone and in combination in young growing rabbits. Indian Journal of Veterinary Pathology. 31(1). 45–49.2 indexed citations
20.
Indrayan, Abhaya, et al.. (2005). Determination of nutritive value and analysis of mineral elements for some medicinally valued plants from Uttaranchal. Current Science. 89(7). 1252–1253.161 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.