M. King

7.8k total citations
9 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

M. King is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. King has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in History and Philosophy of Science, 4 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 3 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. King's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). M. King is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). M. King collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Belgium. M. King's co-authors include Yannis Zorgios, Mike Uschold, Michael Stöltzner, P. Mättig, Luc Bouwens, Rik Van de Walle, Howard C. Gifford, R. A. Dierckx, Ignace Lemahieu and P. Bechtle and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, Synthese and Nuclear Medicine Communications.

In The Last Decade

M. King

8 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. King Germany	5	336	269	247	57	47	9	531
GertJan van Heijst Netherlands	7	387 1.2×	206 0.8×	94 0.4×	17 0.3×	78 1.7×	19	535
Borys Omelayenko Netherlands	12	375 1.1×	342 1.3×	102 0.4×	19 0.3×	127 2.7×	22	555
Daniel Oberle Germany	15	401 1.2×	400 1.5×	165 0.7×	10 0.2×	163 3.5×	39	572
Byron Marshall United States	12	185 0.6×	184 0.7×	88 0.4×	9 0.2×	49 1.0×	35	456
Robert M. Colomb Australia	12	277 0.8×	183 0.7×	77 0.3×	10 0.2×	112 2.4×	65	464
Jiexun Li United States	18	517 1.5×	233 0.9×	66 0.3×	31 0.5×	19 0.4×	27	889
Alex Berson	5	145 0.4×	253 0.9×	138 0.6×	9 0.2×	100 2.1×	7	579
Lu Zhen China	11	119 0.4×	128 0.5×	32 0.1×	42 0.7×	28 0.6×	18	312
Thomas Steiner Spain	13	275 0.8×	187 0.7×	37 0.1×	16 0.3×	77 1.6×	53	561
Imane El Alaoui Morocco	10	167 0.5×	101 0.4×	128 0.5×	8 0.1×	38 0.8×	18	379

Countries citing papers authored by M. King

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. King

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. King. The network helps show where M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. King

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. King. M. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Bechtle, P., et al.. (2022). Bottoms up: The Standard Model Effective Field Theory from a model perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 92. 129–143. 4 indexed citations

2.

King, M.. (2021). Conjectures and Disconfirmations: Confirming the Standard Model Higgs. Erkenntnis. 88(7). 2727–2747. 1 indexed citations

3.

King, M.. (2020). Explanations and candidate explanations in physics. European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 10(1). 1 indexed citations

4.

King, M., et al.. (2019). From a boson to the standard model Higgs: a case study in confirmation and model dynamics. Synthese. 198(S16). 3779–3811. 13 indexed citations

5.

King, M.. (2015). On structural accounts of model-explanations. Synthese. 193(9). 2761–2778. 5 indexed citations

6.

Stodilka, Robert Z., et al.. (2009). Small field-of-view cardiac SPECT can be implemented on hybrid SPECT/CT platforms where data acquisition and reconstruction are guided by CT. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 30(9). 718–726. 2 indexed citations

7.

Bouwens, Luc, Rik Van de Walle, Howard C. Gifford, et al.. (2002). Separating the object and detector dependent characteristics of projector/backprojector through use of an intermediate stage. 2000 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37149). 2. 15/165–15/169.

8.

Bouwens, Luc, Rik Van de Walle, Howard C. Gifford, et al.. (2001). LMIRA: list-mode iterative reconstruction algorithm for SPECT. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 48(4). 1364–1370. 11 indexed citations

9.

Uschold, Mike, et al.. (1998). The Enterprise Ontology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 13(1). 31–89. 494 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact