M. Jane Riddoch
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Glyn W. HumphreysCathy J. PricePhilip T. QuinlanWai‐Ling BickertonNele DemeyereElitsa SlavkovaJill RamsaySanjay Kumar
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers)Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (13 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers)
- Journals
- BrainPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesThe British Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumAustralia
In The Last Decade
M. Jane Riddoch
39 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.6k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 389
- Social Psychology 304
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 231
- Psychiatry and Mental health 212
Countries citing papers authored by M. Jane Riddoch
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Jane Riddoch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Jane Riddoch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Jane Riddoch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Jane Riddoch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Jane Riddoch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Jane Riddoch. The network helps show where M. Jane Riddoch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Jane Riddoch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Jane Riddoch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Jane Riddoch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Jane Riddoch. M. Jane Riddoch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 212 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 57 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 78 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 50 | |
| 13 | 136 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | Neuropsychological perspectives on 'Pusher syndrome' | 6 |
| 17 | Abnormal responses to multi-element spatial stimuli in a subject with visual form agnosia | 1 |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 175 | |
| 20 | 279 |
About M. Jane Riddoch
M. Jane Riddoch is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (15 papers), Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (13 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (389 citations) and Rehabilitation (140 citations). M. Jane Riddoch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Glyn W. Humphreys, Glyn W. Humphreys, Cathy J. Price, Philip T. Quinlan, Wai‐Ling Bickerton, Nele Demeyere, Elitsa Slavkova, Jill Ramsay, Sanjay Kumar and Dana Samson. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and The British Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.