M. Hof

2.4k total citations
8 papers, 263 citations indexed

About

M. Hof is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Hof has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 263 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in M. Hof's work include Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers). M. Hof is often cited by papers focused on Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (5 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (3 papers) and Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (2 papers). M. Hof collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Denmark. M. Hof's co-authors include M. Simon, R. E. Streitmatter, W. Menn, E. R. Christian, J. W. Mitchell, L. Barbier, S. M. Schindler, R. A. Mewaldt, I. L. Rasmussen and S. J. Stochaj and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment.

In The Last Decade

M. Hof

8 papers receiving 251 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Hof Germany 6 213 118 32 22 21 8 263
A. Karle United States 8 255 1.2× 104 0.9× 18 0.6× 15 0.7× 20 1.0× 27 290
Junpei Harada Japan 11 195 0.9× 112 0.9× 18 0.6× 2 0.1× 7 0.3× 23 265
K. E. Krombel United States 6 193 0.9× 119 1.0× 28 0.9× 23 1.0× 18 0.9× 8 232
E. Juliusson United States 7 279 1.3× 173 1.5× 11 0.3× 54 2.5× 26 1.2× 16 338
D. Naumov Russia 9 247 1.2× 56 0.5× 34 1.1× 4 0.2× 17 0.8× 33 271
Dieter Heck Germany 6 188 0.9× 42 0.4× 9 0.3× 11 0.5× 20 1.0× 10 216
Sujie Lin China 12 401 1.9× 227 1.9× 18 0.6× 9 0.4× 12 0.6× 26 421
M. Ave United States 12 634 3.0× 233 2.0× 7 0.2× 12 0.5× 19 0.9× 34 655
Michael Korsmeier Germany 10 488 2.3× 254 2.2× 45 1.4× 9 0.4× 9 0.4× 25 506
J. B. G. M. Bloemen Netherlands 11 213 1.0× 250 2.1× 12 0.4× 4 0.2× 16 0.8× 31 299

Countries citing papers authored by M. Hof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Hof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Hof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Hof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Hof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Hof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Hof. The network helps show where M. Hof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Hof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Hof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Hof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Hof. M. Hof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hams, T., L. Barbier, E. R. Christian, et al.. (2004). Measurement of the Abundance of Radioactive10Be and Other Light Isotopes in Cosmic Radiation up to 2 GeV Nucleon−1with the Balloon‐borne Instrument ISOMAX. The Astrophysical Journal. 611(2). 892–905. 51 indexed citations
2.
Hof, M., H. Göbel, T. Hams, et al.. (2000). ISOMAX: a balloon-borne instrument to measure cosmic ray isotopes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 454(1). 180–185. 4 indexed citations
3.
Menn, W., M. Hof, O. Reimer, et al.. (2000). The Absolute Flux of Protons and Helium at the Top of the Atmosphere Using IMAX. The Astrophysical Journal. 533(1). 281–297. 101 indexed citations
4.
Reimer, O., W. Menn, M. Hof, et al.. (1998). The Cosmic‐Ray3He/4He Ratio from 200 MeV per Nucleon−1to 3.7 GeV per Nucleon−1. The Astrophysical Journal. 496(1). 490–502. 25 indexed citations
5.
Bruijn, Jack H.M. de & M. Hof. (1997). HOW TO MEASURE NO EFFECT. PART IV: HOW ACCEPTABLE IS THE ECx FROM AN ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY POINT OF VIEW?. Environmetrics. 8(3). 263–267. 18 indexed citations
6.
Mitchell, J. W., L. Barbier, E. R. Christian, et al.. (1996). Measurement of 0.25–3.2 GeV Antiprotons in the Cosmic Radiation. Physical Review Letters. 76(17). 3057–3060. 58 indexed citations
7.
Hof, M., W. Menn, O. Reimer, et al.. (1994). Performance of drift chambers in a magnetic rigidity spectrometer for measuring the cosmic radiation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 345(3). 561–569. 5 indexed citations
8.
Hof, M., J. Isbert, M. Simon, et al.. (1989). A drift chamber telescope for heavy ion track detection with high spatial resolution. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 276(3). 628–635. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026