Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Acetaminophen-induced Hepatic Necrosis
1974894 citationsDavid J. Jollow, S S Thorgeirsson et al.Pharmacologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M Hashimoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M Hashimoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M Hashimoto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M Hashimoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M Hashimoto. The network helps show where M Hashimoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M Hashimoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M Hashimoto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M Hashimoto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M Hashimoto. M Hashimoto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hashimoto, M, et al.. (1998). Changes in plasma and urinary norepinephrine following transdermal clonidine in spontaneously hypertensive rats.. PubMed. 48(8). 811–7.2 indexed citations
Miyazaki, Hisashi, et al.. (1991). Disposition and metabolism of [14C]sparfloxacin in the rat.. PubMed. 41(7). 747–59.22 indexed citations
7.
Miyazaki, Hisashi, et al.. (1991). Disposition and metabolism of [14C]sparfloxacin after repeated administration in the rat.. PubMed. 41(7). 760–3.1 indexed citations
8.
Hashimoto, M, et al.. (1990). [Clinical electrophysiological effects of nicorandil on the conduction system in humans].. PubMed. 38(7). 683–6.3 indexed citations
9.
Yoshida, Kōji, et al.. (1988). Disposition and metabolism of [14C]-amezinium metilsulfate in rats.. PubMed. 38(7). 909–18.1 indexed citations
10.
Matsumoto, K, et al.. (1986). Disposition and metabolism of the novel antihypertensive agent alacepril in rats.. CORROSION. 36(1). 40–6.17 indexed citations
11.
Miyazaki, Hisashi, et al.. (1986). Excretion and metabolism of intramuscularly administered [14C]-haloperidol decanoate in rats.. PubMed. 36(3). 453–6.7 indexed citations
12.
Miyazaki, Hisashi, et al.. (1986). Disposition and metabolism of [14C]-haloperidol in rats.. PubMed. 36(3). 443–52.24 indexed citations
13.
Fujii, Toshihiko, et al.. (1984). [Disposition and metabolism of 14C-dehydrocorydaline in mice and rats].. PubMed. 33(8). 519–25.6 indexed citations
14.
Matsumoto, K, et al.. (1983). Absorption, distribution and excretion of 3-(sulfamoyl[14C]methyl)-1,2-benziosoxazole (AD-810) in Rats, Dogs and Monkeys and of AD-810 in Men.. PubMed. 33(7). 961–8.51 indexed citations
Jollow, David J., S S Thorgeirsson, William Z. Potter, M Hashimoto, & John R. Mitchell. (1974). Acetaminophen-induced Hepatic Necrosis. Pharmacology. 12(4-5). 251–271.894 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.