M. H. Chaplin

530 total citations
30 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

M. H. Chaplin is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, M. H. Chaplin has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Plant Science, 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in M. H. Chaplin's work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (21 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (14 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers). M. H. Chaplin is often cited by papers focused on Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (21 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (14 papers) and Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management (6 papers). M. H. Chaplin collaborates with scholars based in United States. M. H. Chaplin's co-authors include M. N. Westwood, Esmaeil Fallahi, Daryl G. Richardson, Lloyd W. Martin, Nick E. Christians, Eric J. Hanson, Jason Kruse, Patrick J. Breen, A. N. Roberts and Nancy W. Callan and has published in prestigious journals such as Crop Science, Agronomy Journal and Scientia Horticulturae.

In The Last Decade

M. H. Chaplin

28 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. H. Chaplin United States 13 363 47 41 38 38 30 421
MJ Dalling Australia 8 362 1.0× 28 0.6× 19 0.5× 39 1.0× 36 0.9× 12 437
A. G. Law United States 9 232 0.6× 19 0.4× 26 0.6× 34 0.9× 37 1.0× 22 290
Judith V. Purves United Kingdom 11 528 1.5× 22 0.5× 23 0.6× 127 3.3× 118 3.1× 13 574
A. W. Pauli United States 10 259 0.7× 28 0.6× 15 0.4× 30 0.8× 44 1.2× 33 348
John S. Pate Australia 14 569 1.6× 32 0.7× 59 1.4× 103 2.7× 91 2.4× 15 655
Thomas W. Fermanian United States 10 146 0.4× 63 1.3× 58 1.4× 62 1.6× 25 0.7× 30 280
N. Suzanne Lang United States 12 305 0.8× 67 1.4× 81 2.0× 69 1.8× 19 0.5× 23 404
T. Muraoka United States 14 519 1.4× 83 1.8× 16 0.4× 85 2.2× 92 2.4× 33 563
C. V. Cutting United States 6 249 0.7× 24 0.5× 23 0.6× 73 1.9× 37 1.0× 10 323
Sue French United States 10 249 0.7× 8 0.2× 21 0.5× 20 0.5× 48 1.3× 24 344

Countries citing papers authored by M. H. Chaplin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. H. Chaplin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. H. Chaplin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. H. Chaplin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. H. Chaplin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. H. Chaplin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. H. Chaplin. The network helps show where M. H. Chaplin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. H. Chaplin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. H. Chaplin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. H. Chaplin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. H. Chaplin. M. H. Chaplin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hanson, Eric J., M. H. Chaplin, & Patrick J. Breen. (1985). Movement of Foliar Applied Boron out of Leaves and Accumulation in Flower Buds and Flower Parts of ‘Italian’ Prune. HortScience. 20(4). 747–748. 33 indexed citations
2.
Fallahi, Esmaeil, Daryl G. Richardson, M. N. Westwood, & M. H. Chaplin. (1985). Relationships among mineral nutrition, ethylene and post-harvest physiology in apples on six rootstocks. Scientia Horticulturae. 25(2). 163–175. 27 indexed citations
3.
Fallahi, Esmaeil, M. N. Westwood, Daryl G. Richardson, & M. H. Chaplin. (1984). Effects of rootstocks and K and N fertilizers on seasonal apple fruit mineral composition in a high density orchard. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 7(8). 1179–1201. 21 indexed citations
4.
Fallahi, Esmaeil, M. N. Westwood, M. H. Chaplin, & Daryl G. Richardson. (1984). Influence of apple rootstocks and k and n fertilizers on leaf mineral composition and yield in a high density orchard. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 7(8). 1161–1177. 38 indexed citations
5.
6.
Chaplin, M. H. & A. N. Roberts. (1981). Seasonal nutrient element distribution in leaves of ‘ace’ and. ‘Nellie White’ cultivars of the Easter Lily, L. longiflorum L.. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 12(3). 227–237. 4 indexed citations
7.
Chaplin, M. H. & M. N. Westwood. (1980). Nutritional Status of ‘Bartlett’ Pear on Cydonia and Pyrus Species Rootstocks1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 105(1). 60–63. 17 indexed citations
8.
Chaplin, M. H. & Lloyd W. Martin. (1980). The effect of nitrogen and boron fertilizer applications on leaf levels, yield and fruit size of the red raspberry. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 11(6). 547–556. 23 indexed citations
9.
Chaplin, M. H. & M. N. Westwood. (1980). Effects ofpyrusspecies and related genera rootstocks on mineral uptake in ‘Bartlett’ pear1. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2(3). 335–346. 12 indexed citations
10.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1979). Elemental Composition of Red Raspberry Leaves as a Function of Time of Season and Position on Cane1. HortScience. 14(1). 46–47. 6 indexed citations
11.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1979). Influence of Mycorrhiza on the Nutrition of Red Raspberries1. HortScience. 14(4). 521–523. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1979). The Development of Standard Ranges for Leaf Nitrogen in the Filbert1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 104(5). 710–712. 6 indexed citations
13.
Callan, Nancy W., et al.. (1978). Fruit Set of ‘Italian’ Prune Following Fall Foliar and Spring Boron Sprays1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 103(2). 253–257. 24 indexed citations
14.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1977). Effect of Fall-applied Boron Sprays on Fruit Set and Yield of ‘Italian’ Prune1. HortScience. 12(5). 500–501. 23 indexed citations
15.
Westwood, M. N., et al.. (1975). Effects of Scion and Rootstock on Mineral Nutrient Content of Leaves of both Scions and Rootstocks of Sweet Cherry1. HortScience. 10(3). 234–235. 4 indexed citations
16.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1974). A Method for Analysis of Plant Tissue by Direct Reading Spark Emission Spectroscopy. Applied Spectroscopy. 28(1). 5–8. 50 indexed citations
17.
Westwood, M. N., M. H. Chaplin, & A. N. Roberts. (1973). Effects of Rootstock on Growth, Bloom, Yield, Maturity, and Fruit Quality of Prune (Prunus domestica L.)1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 98(4). 352–357. 9 indexed citations
18.
Chaplin, M. H., M. N. Westwood, & A. N. Roberts. (1972). Effects of Rootstock on Leaf Element Content of ‘Italian’ Prune (Prunus domestica L.)1. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 97(5). 641–644. 10 indexed citations
19.
Chaplin, M. H. & M. N. Westwood. (1972). A Method for Estimating the Yields of Sweet Cherry1. HortScience. 7(5). 508–509. 5 indexed citations
20.
Chaplin, M. H., et al.. (1970). The influence of sucdnamic acid 2,2-dimethyl hydrazlde on fruit ripening of the 'Windsor' sweet cherry.. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 95.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by MJ Dalling Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. G. Law Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Judith V. Purves Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. W. Pauli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John S. Pate Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thomas W. Fermanian Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Suzanne Lang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. Muraoka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by C. V. Cutting Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sue French
Rankless by CCL
2026