M. Grover

1.2k total citations
24 papers, 974 citations indexed

About

M. Grover is a scholar working on Geophysics, Materials Chemistry and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Grover has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 974 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Geophysics, 10 papers in Materials Chemistry and 9 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in M. Grover's work include High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers). M. Grover is often cited by papers focused on High-pressure geophysics and materials (12 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers) and Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (3 papers). M. Grover collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and India. M. Grover's co-authors include R. Silbey, G. D. Stevens, W. D. Turley, W. T. Buttler, Brandon LaLone, J. E. Hammerberg, L. R. Veeser, Martin Schauer, P. A. Rigg and K.B. Morley and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Applied Physics and Journal of Physics Conference Series.

In The Last Decade

M. Grover

23 papers receiving 933 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Grover United States 13 443 359 280 217 187 24 974
B. H. Failor United States 17 573 1.3× 686 1.9× 174 0.6× 194 0.9× 368 2.0× 66 1.2k
M. A. Walker Australia 24 637 1.4× 651 1.8× 117 0.4× 67 0.3× 80 0.4× 83 1.8k
K. S. Budil United States 19 944 2.1× 818 2.3× 682 2.4× 137 0.6× 395 2.1× 33 1.5k
G. G. Scott United States 17 706 1.6× 379 1.1× 134 0.5× 73 0.3× 228 1.2× 71 1.2k
R. Gähler Germany 28 1.8k 4.0× 310 0.9× 474 1.7× 197 0.9× 35 0.2× 81 2.4k
S. Ichimaru Japan 18 361 0.8× 434 1.2× 295 1.1× 57 0.3× 47 0.3× 59 1.6k
Brian Cowan United Kingdom 22 1.3k 2.9× 236 0.7× 126 0.5× 213 1.0× 71 0.4× 112 1.7k
A. Widom United States 20 1.1k 2.6× 100 0.3× 74 0.3× 222 1.0× 122 0.7× 123 1.6k
Jean‐Bernard Maillet France 20 293 0.7× 29 0.1× 360 1.3× 700 3.2× 428 2.3× 66 1.2k
H. Kählert Germany 23 1.3k 2.8× 97 0.3× 317 1.1× 207 1.0× 51 0.3× 90 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Grover

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Grover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Grover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Grover more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Grover

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Grover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Grover. The network helps show where M. Grover may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Grover

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Grover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Grover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Grover. M. Grover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Buttler, W. T., J. C. Cooley, J. E. Hammerberg, et al.. (2020). Studies of reactive and nonreactive metals–ejecta–transporting nonreactive and reactive gases and vacuum. AIP conference proceedings. 2272. 120003–120003. 4 indexed citations
3.
Schwarzkopf, John D., Daniel Sheppard, J. E. Hammerberg, et al.. (2020). Modeling of cerium ejecta in helium and deuterium gases. AIP conference proceedings. 2272. 70042–70042. 3 indexed citations
4.
Schauer, Martin, W. T. Buttler, D. S. Sorenson, et al.. (2018). Constraining ejecta particle size distributions with light scattering. AIP conference proceedings. 1979. 80013–80013. 9 indexed citations
5.
Schauer, Martin, W. T. Buttler, M. Grover, et al.. (2017). Ejected Particle Size Distributions from Shocked Metal Surfaces. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials. 3(2). 217–224. 34 indexed citations
6.
Buttler, W. T., G. T. Gray, Saryu Fensin, et al.. (2017). Yield strength of Cu and a CuPb alloy (1% Pb). AIP conference proceedings. 1793. 110005–110005. 2 indexed citations
7.
Wood, W. M., W. T. Buttler, Thomas Vidick, et al.. (2017). Ejecta Directions and Size Information from Recent “Sweeper Wave” Data in Sn. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials. 3(2). 240–252. 5 indexed citations
8.
Buttler, W. T., S. K. Lamoreaux, R. Schulze, et al.. (2017). Ejecta Transport, Breakup and Conversion. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials. 3(2). 334–345. 26 indexed citations
9.
Sorenson, D. S., Gene A. Capelle, M. Grover, et al.. (2017). Μeasurements of Sn Ejecta Particle-Size Distributions Using Ultraviolet In-line Fraunhofer Holography. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials. 3(2). 233–239. 25 indexed citations
10.
Buttler, W. T., M. Grover, Brandon LaLone, et al.. (2015). Ejected particle size measurement using Mie scattering in high explosive driven shockwave experiments. Journal of Applied Physics. 117(22). 46 indexed citations
11.
Oró, D., M. Grover, J. E. Hammerberg, et al.. (2014). Experimental observations on the links between surface perturbation parameters and shock-induced mass ejection. Journal of Applied Physics. 116(6). 69 indexed citations
12.
Sandberg, Richard L., G. Rodríguez, Dana M. Dattelbaum, et al.. (2014). Embedded optical probes for simultaneous pressure and temperature measurement of materials in extreme conditions. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 500(14). 142031–142031. 10 indexed citations
13.
Rodríguez, G., Richard L. Sandberg, Brandon LaLone, et al.. (2014). High pressure sensing and dynamics using high speed fiber Bragg grating interrogation systems. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9098. 90980C–90980C. 21 indexed citations
14.
Turley, W. D., G. D. Stevens, Gene A. Capelle, et al.. (2013). Luminescence from edge fracture in shocked lithium fluoride crystals. Journal of Applied Physics. 113(13). 11 indexed citations
15.
Turley, W. D., D. B. Holtkamp, L. R. Veeser, et al.. (2011). Infrared emissivity of tin upon release of a 25 GPa shock into a lithium fluoride window. Journal of Applied Physics. 110(10). 15 indexed citations
16.
Seifter, A., M. Grover, D. B. Holtkamp, et al.. (2011). Emissivity measurements of shocked tin using a multi-wavelength integrating sphere. Journal of Applied Physics. 110(9). 20 indexed citations
17.
Seifter, A., Michael R. Furlanetto, M. Grover, et al.. (2009). Use of IR pyrometry to measure free-surface temperatures of partially melted tin as a function of shock pressure. Journal of Applied Physics. 105(12). 10 indexed citations
18.
Zellner, Michael B., M. Grover, J. E. Hammerberg, et al.. (2007). Effects of shock-breakout pressure on ejection of micron-scale material from shocked tin surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics. 102(1). 126 indexed citations
19.
Grover, M. & R. Silbey. (1971). Exciton Migration in Molecular Crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 54(11). 4843–4851. 280 indexed citations
20.
Grover, M. & R. Silbey. (1970). Exciton–Phonon Interactions in Molecular Crystals. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 52(4). 2099–2108. 138 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026