Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Alfvénic waves with sufficient energy to power the quiet solar corona and fast solar wind
2011385 citationsM. Carlsson, M. Goossens et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Goossens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Goossens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Goossens more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Goossens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Goossens. The network helps show where M. Goossens may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Goossens
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Goossens.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Goossens based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M. Goossens. M. Goossens is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Srivastava, A. K., J. L. Ballester, P. S. Cally, et al.. (2021). Chromospheric heating by magnetohydrodynamic waves and instabilities. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast).24 indexed citations
Goossens, M.. (2008). The LaTeX Graphics companion. Addison-Wesley eBooks.3 indexed citations
9.
Bárta, M., M. Karlický, B. Vršnak, & M. Goossens. (2007). MHD Waves and Shocks Generated during Magnetic Field Reconnection. 31. 165–180.3 indexed citations
10.
Goossens, M., et al.. (2000). Frequency dependence of resonant absorption and over-reflection of magnetosonic waves in nonuniform structures with shear mass flow.. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University).2 indexed citations
11.
Goossens, M., et al.. (2000). Waves in dusty, solar, and space plasmas, Leuven, Belgium, 22-26 May 2000. American Institute of Physics eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Goossens, M., et al.. (1999). The LaTeX web companion. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 33(10). 1010–4.11 indexed citations
13.
Mittelbach, Frank, et al.. (1999). The LaTeX Companion (Tools and Techniques for Computer Typesetting). Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks.7 indexed citations
14.
Béraud-Colomb, Éliane, Régine Roubin, N Maroc, et al.. (1997). Reply to Cooper. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 60(4). 1002–1003.9 indexed citations
15.
Goossens, M., et al.. (1996). Numerical Simulation of Driven MHD Waves in Twisted Coronal Loops. 34. 163–168.1 indexed citations
16.
Pintér, Balázs, R. Erdélyi, & M. Goossens. (1996). The linear spectrum of 1-dimensional coronal flux tubes in viscous MHD. 34. 169–174.3 indexed citations
Goossens, M., et al.. (1994). Marfes: a general magnetohydrodynamic study in a one-dimensional tokamak model. Physics of Fluids. 1. 2623.1 indexed citations
Cuypers, J. & M. Goossens. (1981). Frequency Analysis of Photometric Observations of the Beta-Cephei Star Nu-Eridani. 45. 487–497.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.