M. Goncharov

941 total citations
11 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

M. Goncharov is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Goncharov has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 9 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 3 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in M. Goncharov's work include Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers). M. Goncharov is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (10 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (9 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers). M. Goncharov collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Switzerland. M. Goncharov's co-authors include Yu. N. Novikov, S. Eliseev, M. Block, L. Schweikhard, K. Blaum, E. Minaya Ramirez, C. Droese, D. A. Nesterenko, Andreas Dörr and S. Sturm and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

M. Goncharov

11 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Goncharov Germany 10 415 299 120 91 32 11 521
M. Reponen Finland 15 400 1.0× 261 0.9× 161 1.3× 120 1.3× 27 0.8× 51 524
C. Droese Germany 14 503 1.2× 260 0.9× 116 1.0× 101 1.1× 43 1.3× 15 569
M. Eibach Germany 13 323 0.8× 190 0.6× 113 0.9× 75 0.8× 15 0.5× 36 408
J. Ketter Germany 11 226 0.5× 215 0.7× 89 0.7× 83 0.9× 13 0.4× 15 333
P. Karvonen Finland 11 348 0.8× 183 0.6× 153 1.3× 47 0.5× 14 0.4× 27 393
S. G. Zemlyanoi Russia 13 349 0.8× 286 1.0× 146 1.2× 90 1.0× 17 0.5× 31 461
E. Sauvan France 12 622 1.5× 290 1.0× 233 1.9× 80 0.9× 9 0.3× 16 661
A. Chaudhuri Germany 11 363 0.9× 234 0.8× 117 1.0× 96 1.1× 12 0.4× 24 440
M. Facina United States 12 432 1.0× 264 0.9× 225 1.9× 88 1.0× 15 0.5× 23 546
J. Billowes United Kingdom 13 263 0.6× 238 0.8× 92 0.8× 106 1.2× 15 0.5× 26 349

Countries citing papers authored by M. Goncharov

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Goncharov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Goncharov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Goncharov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Goncharov

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Goncharov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Goncharov. The network helps show where M. Goncharov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Goncharov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Goncharov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Goncharov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Goncharov. M. Goncharov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Filianin, P., S. Schmidt, K. Blaum, et al.. (2016). The decay energy of the pure s-process nuclide 123 Te. Physics Letters B. 758. 407–411. 5 indexed citations
2.
Köhler, Florian, K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2016). Isotope dependence of the Zeeman effect in lithium-like calcium. Nature Communications. 7(1). 71 indexed citations
3.
Eliseev, S., K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2015). Direct Measurement of the Mass Difference ofHo163andDy163Solves theQ-Value Puzzle for the Neutrino Mass Determination. Physical Review Letters. 115(6). 62501–62501. 75 indexed citations
4.
Nesterenko, D. A., S. Eliseev, K. Blaum, et al.. (2014). Direct determination of the atomic mass difference ofRe187andOs187for neutrino physics and cosmochronology. Physical Review C. 90(4). 19 indexed citations
5.
Eliseev, S., K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2013). Phase-Imaging Ion-Cyclotron-Resonance Measurements for Short-Lived Nuclides. Physical Review Letters. 110(8). 82501–82501. 113 indexed citations
6.
Eliseev, S., K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2013). A phase-imaging technique for cyclotron-frequency measurements. Applied Physics B. 114(1-2). 107–128. 63 indexed citations
7.
Roux, Christian, K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2013). Data analysis of Q-value measurements for double-electron capture with SHIPTRAP. The European Physical Journal D. 67(7). 20 indexed citations
8.
López-Urrutia, J. R. Crespo, Andreas Dörr, S. Eliseev, et al.. (2012). PENTATRAP: a novel cryogenic multi-Penning-trap experiment for high-precision mass measurements on highly charged ions. Applied Physics B. 107(4). 983–996. 56 indexed citations
9.
Goncharov, M., K. Blaum, M. Block, et al.. (2011). Probing the nuclides102Pd,106Cd, and144Sm for resonant neutrinoless double-electron capture. Physical Review C. 84(2). 36 indexed citations
10.
Roux, Christian, C. Böhm, Andreas Dörr, et al.. (2011). The trap design of PENTATRAP. Applied Physics B. 107(4). 997–1005. 25 indexed citations
11.
Eliseev, S., M. Goncharov, K. Blaum, et al.. (2011). Multiple-resonance phenomenon in neutrinoless double-electron capture. Physical Review C. 84(1). 38 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026