M. G. Benedict

1.5k total citations
58 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

M. G. Benedict is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. G. Benedict has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 17 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 12 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. G. Benedict's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (15 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (15 papers). M. G. Benedict is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (15 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (15 papers). M. G. Benedict collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Belgium and Germany. M. G. Benedict's co-authors include Péter Földi, F. M. Peeters, Attila Czirják, Orsolya Kálmán, E. D. Trifonov, А. И. Зайцев, В. А. Малышев, Csaba Benedek, Vladislav S. Yakovlev and L. Fehér and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review A and Optics Express.

In The Last Decade

M. G. Benedict

52 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. G. Benedict Hungary 17 1.0k 273 273 142 67 58 1.1k
Th. Martin United States 8 1.1k 1.1× 235 0.9× 393 1.4× 135 1.0× 77 1.1× 18 1.2k
V. I. Tsifrinovich United States 17 608 0.6× 358 1.3× 111 0.4× 96 0.7× 76 1.1× 76 765
Emmanuel Flurin France 17 1.2k 1.1× 839 3.1× 284 1.0× 99 0.7× 73 1.1× 36 1.3k
Weiping Zhang China 21 1.5k 1.4× 796 2.9× 257 0.9× 125 0.9× 30 0.4× 88 1.6k
V. M. Akulin France 17 1.2k 1.1× 625 2.3× 70 0.3× 147 1.0× 89 1.3× 67 1.4k
Nobuyasu Shiga Japan 9 876 0.8× 611 2.2× 142 0.5× 64 0.5× 98 1.5× 37 1.1k
Kevin J. Weatherill United Kingdom 19 2.1k 2.1× 575 2.1× 224 0.8× 107 0.8× 32 0.5× 44 2.3k
Pavel Bushev Germany 20 1.1k 1.0× 500 1.8× 226 0.8× 102 0.7× 169 2.5× 30 1.2k
J.-Q. Liang China 16 693 0.7× 213 0.8× 111 0.4× 132 0.9× 56 0.8× 82 773
D. H. Slichter United States 14 1.2k 1.2× 952 3.5× 207 0.8× 90 0.6× 46 0.7× 33 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. G. Benedict

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. G. Benedict's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. G. Benedict with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. G. Benedict more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. G. Benedict

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. G. Benedict. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. G. Benedict. The network helps show where M. G. Benedict may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. G. Benedict

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. G. Benedict. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. G. Benedict based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. G. Benedict. M. G. Benedict is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wolff, Elmar K., et al.. (2020). Biological Microscopy with Undetected Photons. IEEE Access. 8. 107539–107548. 13 indexed citations
2.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2020). Density-based one-dimensional model potentials for strong-field simulations in He, H2+, and H2. Physical review. A. 101(2). 4 indexed citations
3.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2017). Scattering of charged particles on two spatially separated time-periodic optical fields. Physical review. A. 96(6). 1 indexed citations
4.
Czirják, Attila, et al.. (2013). Emergence of oscillations in quantum entanglement during rescattering. Physica Scripta. T153. 14013–14013. 13 indexed citations
5.
Földi, Péter, M. G. Benedict, & Vladislav S. Yakovlev. (2013). The effect of dynamical Bloch oscillations on optical-field-induced current in a wide-gap dielectric. New Journal of Physics. 15(6). 63019–63019. 42 indexed citations
6.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2012). Time dependence of quantum entanglement in the collision of two particles. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical. 45(8). 85304–85304. 13 indexed citations
7.
Földi, Péter, Orsolya Kálmán, & M. G. Benedict. (2010). Two-dimensional quantum rings with oscillating spin-orbit interaction strength: A wave function picture. Physical Review B. 82(16). 15 indexed citations
8.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2009). Global entanglement and coherent states in an ${\sf N}$ -partite system. The European Physical Journal D. 53(2). 237–242.
9.
Földi, Péter, M. G. Benedict, & F. M. Peeters. (2008). Dynamics of periodic anticrossings: Decoherence, pointer states, and hysteresis curves. Physical Review A. 77(1). 10 indexed citations
10.
Kálmán, Orsolya, Péter Földi, M. G. Benedict, & F. M. Peeters. (2008). Magnetoconductance of rectangular arrays of quantum rings. Physical Review B. 78(12). 28 indexed citations
11.
Vasilopoulos, P., Orsolya Kálmán, F. M. Peeters, & M. G. Benedict. (2007). Aharonov-Bohm oscillations in a mesoscopic ring with asymmetric arm-dependent injection. Physical Review B. 75(3). 29 indexed citations
12.
Benedek, Csaba & M. G. Benedict. (2004). Cooperative effects in atom field interactions in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics. 6(3). S111–S117. 26 indexed citations
13.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2001). Method of integral equations for ultrafast pulses and its application to the polariton resonance of GaAs. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 18(12). 1949–1949. 1 indexed citations
14.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (2001). State Evolution in the Anharmonic Morse Potential Subjected to an External Sinusoidal Field. Fortschritte der Physik. 49(10-11). 1053–1053. 2 indexed citations
15.
Molnár, Bence, M. G. Benedict, & J. Bertrand. (2001). Coherent states and the role of the affine group in the quantum mechanics of the Morse potential. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 34(14). 3139–3151. 7 indexed citations
16.
Benedict, M. G., et al.. (1999). Algebraic construction of the coherent states of the Morse potential based on supersymmetric quantum mechanics. Physical Review A. 60(3). R1737–R1740. 71 indexed citations
17.
Czirják, Attila & M. G. Benedict. (1996). Joint Wigner function for atom - field interactions. Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B. 8(5). 975–981. 10 indexed citations
18.
Benedict, M. G. & Attila Czirják. (1995). Generalized parity and quasi-probability density functions. Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General. 28(16). 4599–4608. 5 indexed citations
19.
Benedict, M. G., L. Fehér, & Z. Horvȧth. (1989). Monopoles and instantons from Berry’s phase. Journal of Mathematical Physics. 30(8). 1727–1731. 10 indexed citations
20.
Varga, Zsolt, et al.. (1980). Resonances in the elastic electron‐SF6 molecule scattering. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 17(2). 255–263. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026