M. Fogle

649 total citations
42 papers, 444 citations indexed

About

M. Fogle is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Fogle has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 444 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 18 papers in Spectroscopy and 8 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in M. Fogle's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (36 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers). M. Fogle is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (36 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (18 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers). M. Fogle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. M. Fogle's co-authors include R. Schuch, S. Madzunkov, M. S. Pindzola, Tarek Mohamed, S. D. Loch, M. E. Bannister, J. N. Shaw, Brenda V. Ortiz, Thorsten Knappenberger and C P Ballance and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Physical Review A.

In The Last Decade

M. Fogle

39 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Fogle United States	14	344	118	84	81	80	42	444
С. А. Казанцев Russia	11	217 0.6×	44 0.4×	173 2.1×	60 0.7×	53 0.7×	57	417
D. Nikolić United States	14	215 0.6×	147 1.2×	171 2.0×	132 1.6×	26 0.3×	49	421
A. Chutjian United States	13	369 1.1×	145 1.2×	45 0.5×	236 2.9×	146 1.8×	36	574
Richard B. Kay United States	13	363 1.1×	111 0.9×	55 0.7×	24 0.3×	73 0.9×	38	519
S.M. Ahmed India	13	158 0.5×	101 0.9×	46 0.5×	270 3.3×	12 0.1×	22	458
R. Blackwell-Whitehead United Kingdom	11	130 0.4×	74 0.6×	55 0.7×	180 2.2×	10 0.1×	24	323
D. W. Anthony United States	11	151 0.4×	57 0.5×	23 0.3×	9 0.1×	108 1.4×	19	403
G. L. Ogram Canada	10	149 0.4×	64 0.5×	21 0.3×	16 0.2×	27 0.3×	25	336
M. Krůs Czechia	11	119 0.3×	25 0.2×	145 1.7×	104 1.3×	35 0.4×	51	324
Ove Gustafsson Sweden	10	192 0.6×	95 0.8×	30 0.4×	6 0.1×	35 0.4×	33	295

Countries citing papers authored by M. Fogle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Fogle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Fogle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Fogle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Fogle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Fogle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Fogle. The network helps show where M. Fogle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Fogle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Fogle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Fogle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Fogle. M. Fogle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Dipti, Dipti, N. S. Brickhouse, G. C. O’Neil, et al.. (2025). Charge-exchange processes in EBIT: implications for spectral analysis of few-electronFe ions. Journal of Instrumentation. 20(4). C04028–C04028.

Pindzola, M. S., et al.. (2022). Time-dependent Lattice Cross Sections and Line Ratios for Solar Wind Charge Exchange: Bare Ne Incident on Atomic H and He. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 262(2). 47–47. 1 indexed citations

Ray, Andrew M., et al.. (2022). Attitude Determination and Control Subsystem Testing Environment for 12U Nanosatellites. 3(3). 129–134. 1 indexed citations

Fogle, M. & M. S. Pindzola. (2020). Line intensities for x-ray emission in Mg ¹²⁺ collisions with H and He atoms. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 53(9). 95203–95203. 2 indexed citations

Pindzola, M. S., M. Fogle, & S. D. Loch. (2020). Dielectronic recombination in O ^{4 +} near the ionization threshold. Journal of Physics B Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics. 54(11). 115205–115205.

Cumbee, Renata, D. Lyons, R. L. Shelton, et al.. (2017). Charge Exchange X-Ray Emission due to Highly Charged Ion Collisions with H, He, and H₂: Line Ratios for Heliospheric and Interstellar Applications. The Astrophysical Journal. 852(1). 7–7. 21 indexed citations

Andrianarijaona, V. M., Dallas Wulf, Kelsey M. Morgan, et al.. (2017). Line ratios for soft-x-ray emission following charge exchange betweenO8+and Kr. Physical review. A. 95(5). 13 indexed citations

Loch, S. D., C P Ballance, Y. Li, M. Fogle, & Christopher J. Fontes. (2015). NON-EQUILIBRIUM MODELING OF THE FE XVII 3C/3D LINE RATIO IN AN INTENSE X-RAY FREE-ELECTRON LASER EXCITED PLASMA. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 801(1). L13–L13. 10 indexed citations

Briggs, M. S., et al.. (2015). TRYAD: a Pair of CubeSats to Measure Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flash Beams. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015. 3 indexed citations

10.

Morgan, Kelsey M., V. M. Andrianarijaona, Ilija Draganić, et al.. (2013). Charge exchange x-ray emission: Astrophysical observations and potential diagnostics. AIP conference proceedings. 49–54. 1 indexed citations

11.

Mohamed, Tarek, G. Andler, M. Fogle, et al.. (2011). Effects of polarization on laser-induced electron-ion recombination. Physical Review A. 83(3). 9 indexed citations

12.

Fogle, M., M. E. Bannister, Shujin Deng, et al.. (2010). Electron-impact dissociation ofXH2+(X=B, C, N, O, F): Absolute cross sections for production ofXH+andX+fragment ions. Physical Review A. 82(4). 4 indexed citations

13.

Fogle, M., et al.. (2009). Electron-impact dissociation ofCD3+andCH3+ions producingCD2+,CH+, andC+fragment ions. Physical Review A. 79(5). 4 indexed citations

14.

Zhaunerchyk, Vitali, W. D. Geppert, Mats Larsson, et al.. (2007). Three-Body Breakup in the Dissociative Recombination of the Covalent Triatomic Molecular IonO3+. Physical Review Letters. 98(22). 223201–223201. 15 indexed citations

15.

Meyer, F. W., et al.. (2007). The new ornl multicharged ion research facility floating beamline. 3139–3141. 1 indexed citations

16.

Schuch, R., Eva Lindroth, S. Madzunkov, et al.. (2005). Dielectronic Resonance Method for Measuring Isotope Shifts. Physical Review Letters. 95(18). 183003–183003. 36 indexed citations

17.

Böhm, Sebastian, A. Müller, S. Schippers, et al.. (2005). Experimental N V and Ne VIII low-temperature dielectronic recombination rate coefficients. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 437(3). 1151–1157. 5 indexed citations

18.

Fogle, M., N. R. Badnell, P. Glans, et al.. (2005). Electron-ion recombination of Be-like C, N, and O. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 442(2). 757–766. 29 indexed citations

19.

Fogle, M., et al.. (2003). Determination of the $\ion{Ni}{xviii}$ plasma recombination rate coefficient. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 409(2). 781–786. 10 indexed citations

20.

Mohamed, Tarek, D. Nikolić, Eva Lindroth, et al.. (2002). Dielectronic recombination of lithiumlike beryllium: A theoretical and experimental investigation. Physical Review A. 66(2). 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact